fweimer

5 ms·

1.
by fweimer 6d ago
There's probably still value (if you want to call it that) in it as a proxy, both to bypass IP address rate limits and to add necessarily credentials. There's also another aspect Quite a few API providers provide automatic renewal
2.
by fweimer 6d ago
Likely a reference to ELIZA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
3.
by fweimer 8d ago
It's just a compiler barrier (signal fence), not a memory barrier that concerns the CPU. The CPU is free to reorder loads and stores.
4.
by fweimer 10d ago
Was the public key directory even operational in 2012? What about revocation checking? I think processing that information is mandatory now, but probably was optional/largely unimplemented in 2012. But maybe I'm off by five years
5.
by fweimer 13d ago
I expect that UD2 stops instruction fetching (beyond the current block) and conversion to µops. A software interrupt or supervisor call should probably do neither because most of the time, these instructions eventually return and continue e
6.
by fweimer 16d ago
The leakage wouldn't be from training, but from other uses of Personal Data. As far as I understand it, users can opt out from the training aspect, but they cannot stop their conversations (“User Content”) being used “[t]o improve and
7.
by fweimer 19d ago
If it actually exists, the protection would like go into the other direction: prevent playback of arbitrary MIDI files on the digital piano, instead of protecting the MIDI data against playback on other devices.
8.
by fweimer 20d ago
Public email and IRC archives/logs usually work just fine without Javascript.
9.
by fweimer 20d ago
ihtabs preserve iteration order and have performance competitive with swiss tables (while not requiring as high a load factor): https://github.com/vnmakarov/ihtab
10.
by fweimer 24d ago
As far as I understand it, the other efforts have not reported most of their findings to upstream developers, focusing on critical findings only. This is understandable because upstream interactions at scale are difficult.
11.
by fweimer 28d ago
It's still beneficial on some x86-64 implementations to rewrite indirect jumps (as used in PLT stubs) to direct jumps when feasible. For example, AMD says this about the Zen 4 architecture: > Only a limited number of indirect target
12.
by fweimer 28d ago
Why do you think these volunteers supported the attack? I don't think there's a published statement to the effect. Even the U.S. government does not claim that (at least not in its written communication). The perpetrators very lik
13.
by fweimer 28d ago
> It doesn’t fully explain why Congress has allowed the expansion of executive power for nearly a century, resulting in more and more major issues being pushed to the Supreme Court. It's not just about executive power. In recent tim
14.
by fweimer 28d ago
The TUI version of Claude Code just isn't very good, though. The default keybindings do not work in the majority of terminals (because they generate the same byte sequences for key sequences assigned to different commands). Editing lar
15.
by fweimer 29d ago
These builtins of course exist, it's how compilers keep track of the behavior of these functions. For GCC, there is -minline-all-stringops: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-16.2.0/gcc/x86-Options.ht...
16.
by fweimer 1mo ago
Cases are infrequent, but not extremely unlikely. There's even a term for it, airport malaria: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.E...
17.
by fweimer 1mo ago
Are you sure this is actually makes a difference in your build? Mine doesn't have the SB-INTERPRETER package, so I doubt binding the variable has an effect.
18.
by fweimer 1mo ago
Compiling to bytecode is still compilation. An interpreter would operate directly on the S-expressions. Obviously, this makes some constructs (such as TAGBODY) very inefficient.
19.
by fweimer 1mo ago
But 2 isn't a list, and the argument to unqoute-splicing must be a list: > If an (unquote-splicing <expression> ...) form appears inside a <qq template>, then the <expression>s must evaluate to lists; the opening a
20.
by fweimer 1mo ago
Isn't at least one of them undefined? `(1 ,@2) It's always surprising to me how many things Scheme leaves undefined. Other examples are evaluation order (in some rather surprising places) or the value of: (make-bytevector 4)
21.
by fweimer 1mo ago
I wonder what the intent is behind releasing the weights under a CC-BY-NC license. Is it about restricting any commercial use of the weights, including for inference?
22.
by fweimer 1mo ago
Not in typical builds of SBCL: all code is compiled before evaluation.
23.
by fweimer 1mo ago
I think we'd need something different to make that a reality today. It's likely that decentralized compute eventually wins out here as well. It usually does. But without architectural changes, it will take a couple of years before
24.
by fweimer 1mo ago
Centralized inference can easily increase batch size, leading to huge efficiency gains in the usual scenario where most users have just one or very few session. Using local resources efficiently requires some way to increase the batch size.
25.
by fweimer 2mo ago
This is the relevant law: https://www.buzer.de/8_TDDDG.htm (It used to be §90 TKG.) It's specifically about bug-like devices which transmit the recording. A typical consumer camera does not provide simultaneous uploadi
26.
by fweimer 2mo ago
There are far more cases. Some ABIs use callee-saved registers for parameter-passing under certain circumstances, for example. Usually, there are compatibility restrictions on the signatures of the current and tail-called functions beyond t
27.
by fweimer 2mo ago
It's not really about a monorepo, but how many changes you can have in flight in parallel. Desirability of merge-and-rebase-and-check depends on more factors: the rate of change, the number of developers, the time the pre-merge checks
28.
by fweimer 2mo ago
> interfaces still can’t declare type-parameterized methods What would an implementation look like? Wouldn't it be quite different from the existing one because it has to rely heavily on indirection because (limited) monomorphimizat
29.
by fweimer 2mo ago
I can see it happening if people start depending AI-generated proof libraries for the work they are interested in. Not because the libraries are proprietary, but because they are impenetrable. AI usage wouldn't result in this directly,
30.
by fweimer 2mo ago
I remember enhancing the F-PC visual editor to display the checksum for the current line because I did not have access to whatever method the magazine recommended (maybe OCR with Logitech Scanman?).

More ›