ftxbro

20 ms·

301.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> For all of the constant noise generated by the press, most people don’t really care about their privacy. if that was true then why does literally every web page have a cookie banner that makes me have to learn how that website classifi
302.
by ftxbro 3y ago
Maybe they are pretending they are more advanced than they are, to discourage other people from competing. Or maybe they are really doing it and you should build something else instead.
303.
by ftxbro 3y ago
I don't want tuning or enterprise audits I want GPT-5 with 10x data 10x compute and 10x parameters, or whatever is the most efficient mix.
304.
by ftxbro 3y ago
That would go against the spirit of their statement that OpenAI won't train with your data, so that should mean that they would never do it. At least I hope so.
305.
by ftxbro 3y ago
always hire ea whether its effective altruist or electronic arts you will never go wrong
306.
by ftxbro 3y ago
Also I'd heard anecdotally on the internet (Ethan Mollick's twitter I think) that 'code interpreter' was better than GPT 4 even for tasks that weren't code interpretation. Like it was more like GPT 4.5. Maybe it was
307.
by ftxbro 3y ago
niemann handed over the beads and all was forgiven
308.
by ftxbro 3y ago
Which part of that is new, because I was pretty sure they were saying "we do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage" already. Maybe the SOC 2 and encryption is new?
309.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> For all enterprise customers, it offers: > Customer prompts and company data are not used for training OpenAI models. > Unlimited access to advanced data analysis (formerly known as Code Interpreter) > 32k t
310.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> an unbroken tradition stretching back centuries, decreeing that women were to remain absent from this revered mountain’s embrace. Even domestic critters like cows and sheep had to give this place a wide berth. ok but why do they includ
311.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> That's very easy to say until it's your partner, mother/father, or child on the other side of that assertion. The idea isn't that poor people will get life extension, it's that families of billionaires will get
312.
by ftxbro 3y ago
the market conditions are that we got some suckers out here
313.
by ftxbro 3y ago
I know it's not the same, but it makes me think of risc v
314.
by ftxbro 3y ago
In the future a 'meat industry' will be seen as some kind of barbaric horror.
315.
by ftxbro 3y ago
For anyone who doesn't know, the student who made the 'I Can Eat Glass' project is Ethan Mollick. He's now a professor at Wharton and in my opinion he is the best public LLM whisperer!
316.
by ftxbro 3y ago
llms are literally markov chains
317.
by ftxbro 3y ago
the new standard for true intelligence is godlike omniscience omnipotence and benevolence
318.
by ftxbro 3y ago
Consumer GPUs made matrix multiplications orders of magnitudes cheaper and the resulting new wave of AIs are unlocking new cognitive capabilities by just throwing money to the problem, in a way that scales to billions of dollars. This is di
319.
by ftxbro 3y ago
They were wrong and now they have to pivot, from "AI isn't effective" to "it's bad that AI is so effective."
320.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> I’m something of a skeptic myself. 'AI skeptic' has changed meaning. It used to describe someone skeptical of the technical capability of AI or some aspect of it like LLMs, for example they were skeptical that it could do thi
321.
by ftxbro 3y ago
"The areas where AI has been implemented make clear how poorly it performs. AI potentially creates a situation where millions of people can be fired and replaced with bots—so a few people at the top continue to promote it despite all t
322.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> "What don't you like about the [blurry jpeg] article?" It's valid at some technical level but I dislike it so much. There are so many things. If I had to pick only a few, it's that it encourages to see LLMs as
323.
by ftxbro 3y ago
when i see ted chiang i think of his blurry jpeg LLM take in the new yorker. i'm not a fan of that take. i think it was one of the worst LLM takes, competing with the stochastic parrot take. i heard he wrote some amazing science fictio
324.
by ftxbro 3y ago
> "well-known member of the developer community" OK sorry I didn't know them. I mean I usually use software that came with my computer or ones that I apt-install from the official ubuntu distribution. I know it's not
325.
by ftxbro 3y ago
yes it's better now that the hn mods have changed the headline
326.
by ftxbro 3y ago
I found a few github issues related to api key security and management. I'm not 100% sure of your point.
327.
by ftxbro 3y ago
OK but I mean I don't know them and it could have been someone pretending to be them, and probably it's easily possible to trick me about API keys. We are discussing it on a hacker news website do you seriously think tricks couldn
328.
by ftxbro 3y ago
Has something structurally changed at Stanford where making a graduate student union is now a good idea and it wasn't a good idea before, or was it always a good idea and only now they are doing it?
329.
by ftxbro 3y ago
human level is about 50 and as long as they don't allow to craft paperclips i think it's ok
330.
by ftxbro 3y ago
I am picturing a mob of dirty peasants demanding more rights from their feudal lord and they are somehow Stanford grad students. I don't hate unions but I feel like something has changed where whatever made Stanford prestigious has gon

More ›