4 ms·
Also I'd heard anecdotally on the internet (Ethan Mollick's twitter I think) that 'code interpreter' was better than GPT 4 even for tasks that weren't code inte
by ftxbro 3y ago
Also I'd heard anecdotally on the internet (Ethan Mollick's twitter I think) that 'code interpreter' was better than GPT 4 even for tasks that weren't code interpretation. Like it was more like GPT 4.5. Maybe it was an experimental preview and only enterprises are allowed to use it now. I never had access anyway.
- swores 3y agoI still have access in my $20/m non-Enterprise Pro account, though it has indeed just updated its name from Code Interpreter to Advanced Data Analysis. I haven't personally noticed it being any better than standard GPT4 even for generation of code that can't be run by it (ie non-Python code).
- shmoogy 3y agoI've been using it heavily for the last week - hopefully it doesn't become enterprise only... it's very convenient to pass it some examples and generate and test functions. And it does seem "better" than standard 4 for normal tasks
- swores 3y agoAh I'd better start using it more again and see if I find it better too
- gcanyon 3y agoI also have a pro account, and I’ve looked for and not seen code interpreter in my account. Am I just missing it?
- swyx 3y agoGPT 4.5 concept was from latent space! https://www.latent.space/p/code-interpreter#details https://www.latent.space/p/code-interpreter#details