frrae

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   Communication is based on shared understanding of what things mean. It's not me who has defined intelligence. Go look it up. None of the common definitions is matched by GPTs observable behavior, if you take confirmation bias and athro
2. 2.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   Very true. Still, I feel that people who do know better have a moral obligation to set this straight.
3. 3.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   It's worst for early stage, but applies to all companies except one-man-shows.
4. 4.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   You are indirectly making a great case for requiring that applicants consider the company more that "just a job". If my coworkers ranted like that, I'd not have fun at my work and you'd be dragging morale down. I spend 8
5. 5.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   > What's the purpose of sending a CV when I have to do all the hard work? The article we are discussing here claims that there already is an asymmetry in the sense that the applicant has to put time into polishing a resume while the
6. 6.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   > Saying that the current developments aren't AI is simply wrong. Thank you for illustrating my point so well. What you are expressing is exactly what I'm talking about: The redefinition of what the I in AI stands for. Inferrin
7. 7.▲
   by frrae 4y ago

   GPT Is Not A.I. We tech people should actively go on the offence and educate whomever we can that text inference is not intelligence.