frotaur

8 ms·

91.
by frotaur 1y ago
Consider the plumpest cows whose carcass has been noticed, then subsequently cloned.
92.
by frotaur 1y ago
What they meant is that 3D scanning real places, and translating them into 3D worlds with collision already exists, and provides much, much better results than the AI videos here. Additionally, it does not need what is likely hours of rando
93.
by frotaur 1y ago
Why would you associate this difference with race rather than culture? Seems like culture differences would be a much better answer to your premise.
94.
by frotaur 1y ago
This is correct. Caching only saves you from having to recompute self attention on the system prompt tokens, but not from the attention from subsequent tokens, which are free to attend to the prompt.
95.
by frotaur 1y ago
Nope, a coincidence. We are extremely lucky
96.
by frotaur 1y ago
Aren't they chasing those to ultimately generate profits?
97.
by frotaur 1y ago
Even excluding the fact that this image is simply to illustrate, and it's really not the main point of the article, in the chat you posted, ChatGPT actually failed again, because the r's are not circled.
98.
by frotaur 2y ago
There probably is, but you're also probably not smart enough (and probably no one is) to figure out what it is. But it does happens, in very similar circumstances (twitter, e-mail) very regularly.
99.
by frotaur 2y ago
You might find this tweet interesting : https://x.com/flowersslop/status/1873115669568311727 Very related, I think. Edit : for people who can't/don't want to click, this person finetunes GPT-4 on ~1
100.
by frotaur 2y ago
I really don't care if jobs are replaced, so long that people are still able to make a living. It really becomes a problem if you replace humans as a whole, and don't come up with something to allow them to make a living still suc
101.
by frotaur 2y ago
I assume in an interview you can just ask for the definition. I don't think the interview is (should be) testing for your knowledge of the Fibonacci numbers, but rather your ability to recognize precisely the recursive definition and
102.
by frotaur 2y ago
huh? This is just a funny joke on the way its named, what made you think I don't know about dot products ?
103.
by frotaur 2y ago
As a physicist, I always found it funny that in ML people renamed 'the angle between vectors' into something as fancy-feeling as 'cosine similarity'.
104.
by frotaur 2y ago
Seems o3-mini implements the 'boids' algorithm for flocking (likely due to its prevalence online), but I find that here it doesn't really fit. Indeed in boids each element has a constant (or minimum) velocity, s.t. the sheep
105.
by frotaur 2y ago
Very related : https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17505
106.
by frotaur 2y ago
The example you gave is not very impressive, normal, non-reasoning LLMs have been able to do this for a while. E.g., Claude 3.5 Haiku solves this no problem.
107.
by frotaur 2y ago
See notebookLM, as an example
108.
by frotaur 2y ago
Yes, that's precisely what you would experience according to the paradox described in the post
109.
by frotaur 2y ago
The answer is no. There are statements for which knowing if they are decidable is undecidable.
110.
by frotaur 2y ago
pretty cool, managed to get some reasonable score. I wonder if the high scores are close to the 'theoretical maximum', or if we are an order of magnitude below.
111.
by frotaur 2y ago
You didn't address the need for rare earth metals. Can you link sources talking about the 'unlimited amounts of battery storage'? I was also under the impression (albeit uninformed) that battery storage was not a solved probl
112.
by frotaur 2y ago
I'm very sorry if this isn't the case, but this message really feels LLM-written.
113.
by frotaur 2y ago
Ok, but according to this, linear investments generate linear increase in economic benefits. So why the need to go exponential?
114.
by frotaur 2y ago
You may have missed the sarcasm
115.
by frotaur 2y ago
Sorry, but I find it much easier to find a function with your property, compared to the continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere functions. In fact, here is an uncountable family of them : f(x) = x^2 * rand(0,1) Where rand(0,1) is a
116.
by frotaur 2y ago
The conclusion only holds if you assume that you yourself are not a BB. Yes, in our universe, the laws of physics predict that BBs are much more likely than normal brains, given you wait long enough. However, the moment you assume that then
117.
by frotaur 2y ago
What OP is saying, I think, is that the argument that led us to believe that Boltzmann Brains are more likely than normal brains is itself product of the physics of the world we experience. But then, if we conclude that we must be a BB, the
118.
by frotaur 2y ago
I hate ads as much as the next guy, but this way of thinking feels the most unsustainable of them all. You said it yourself; the only reason you get to watch content ad-free is because other people are either watching ads, or paying for the
119.
by frotaur 2y ago
I also had this view, but thinking a bit more about it, what we consider 'reasonable axioms' in math, all come more or less from our logical intuition. Which was built from our evolution, which respects the laws of physics. This h
120.
by frotaur 2y ago
They mention they did in the article...

More ›