freejazz

39 ms·

871.
by freejazz 2y ago
Well, it's a given that the sun is shining when it is out. Not so much with the AI.
872.
by freejazz 2y ago
>Sounds like you can't provide any response to that. Hopefully you've heard about "at will" before and how that works in US. So far it sounds like you're making stuff up or are talking about some other country or
873.
by freejazz 2y ago
>The point is the defense can show loads of documents about how working together increases efficiency, how they are streamlining units and they plaintiff has to prove they were targeted as an ex-DEI hire and even though there is just hun
874.
by freejazz 2y ago
>By one juror or two, and if the defense lawyers are dummies and fail to do their job. Corporations like IBM have lawyers on retainer and they are not that incompetent. What do you mean by one juror or two? My point is regarding when jur
875.
by freejazz 2y ago
Juries are allowed to infer intent. They do not need an explicit statement admitting it. To be honest, I find it very weird that you quoted that part and had the response you did as if you knew what you were talking about. By your logic, in
876.
by freejazz 2y ago
It's in his post. Why am I going to be quoting verbatim from his post at this point in the conversation?
877.
by freejazz 2y ago
It also contradicts the idea that they are acting transparently.
878.
by freejazz 2y ago
>If I address any of those points, would I be nitpicking and picking on minor details? If you only did that while ignoring my main point, yeah. Not sure why this is a difficult concept for you to grasp. >The user brought up groping an
879.
by freejazz 2y ago
>"Anyone who is fair would see it exactly how I see it!" That's not what I was saying. I was saying anyone would reflect there is a long list of questionable behavior. Whether or not you think that is disqualifying is your
880.
by freejazz 2y ago
Now you're calling me a liar? Pathetic.
881.
by freejazz 2y ago
When you are engaged in a conversation is it a good idea to crater the conversation by myopically focusing on one minor detail, to the detriment of everyone else?
882.
by freejazz 2y ago
>And the bleach argument was the supporting argument for the statement regarding intelligence. It was but one example of a list much longer than the post you responded to, which anyone who was fair would recognize. >Yes really. No, no
883.
by freejazz 2y ago
What does that have to do with my question?
884.
by freejazz 2y ago
Has that been your experience interacting with the law?
885.
by freejazz 2y ago
What does one have to do with the other? Fraud is "intentional deception to gain an unfair or illegal advantage, often resulting in financial or legal harm" what does that have to do with code? What could code even do about fraud?
886.
by freejazz 2y ago
>Nitpicking? Minor quibble? It was the major point that the user brought up. Not really. The major point the user brought up: "I would not say anyone is ‘automatically’ questioning Trump’s character or intelligence. There is plenty
887.
by freejazz 2y ago
You're proving that user right. Taking one minor quibble about what this other poster said, which was obviously not a full recitation of all of Trump's highly questionable conduct over the years (as opposed his less questionab
888.
by freejazz 2y ago
Well if Trump wants it to not seem back-handed to create a scheme to force companies to come to him to negotiate, he should be open about it then
889.
by freejazz 2y ago
I think the point is more like, MusicAI might give you a progression from a Bob Dylan song, but it can't give you a Bob Dylan song and it will be easy to discern between the two.
890.
by freejazz 2y ago
Taking Zuckerberg at his word is beyond naive, it is moronic.
891.
by freejazz 2y ago
Okay? And people gather at the mall, or outside the movie theatre near my house... that doesn't make it not private property.
892.
by freejazz 2y ago
> Free speech is a about whether a society values and protects free speech or not. That's a bit vague. Nothing about this statement on its face would preclude some speech regulations so it reads more like an empty platitude to me.
893.
by freejazz 2y ago
No. The scientists made those 20 gene changes in order to produce a gray wolf that looks like a dire wolf.
894.
by freejazz 2y ago
> The idea is that cold-resistant elephants / woolly mammoth - like creatures would restore arctic steppe grasslands and promote carbon sequestration. Over what timescale? They don't seriously engage with this idea at all. It&#
895.
by freejazz 2y ago
They should have had this character in Jurassic Park
896.
by freejazz 2y ago
I'm not saying it's more moral. Please don't pull this kind of shtick.
897.
by freejazz 2y ago
No, it's not.
898.
by freejazz 2y ago
>This is not quite accurate. Most of the advocates of communism want to contrast the historical instances of capitalism (with all of its visible faults) with the idea of communism (with all of its ideological perfection). I didn't a
899.
by freejazz 2y ago
Was it ever the case they were in touch the with the general population... they are elite after all...
900.
by freejazz 2y ago
I'm not sure how that follows. Do elite universities typically track the general population?

More ›