>If I address any of those points, would I be nitpicking and picking on minor details? If you only did that while ignoring my main point, yeah. Not sure why th

>If I address any of those points, would I be nitpicking and picking on minor details? If you only did that while ignoring my main point, yeah. Not sure why this is a difficult concept for you to grasp. >The user brought up groping and injecting bleach. I refuted the bleach argument, leaving the groping argument alone. It's also not technically right, it's completely incorrect and absolutely disingenous framing. Disagree there, which can be fine and reasonable. But don't pretend you addressed the poster's point, which wasn't the bleach thing. This is basic reading comprehension, again. >I addressed ONE of the TWO reasons the user provided. What other reason am I supposed to have addressed? Should I start making some up? He provided more than two and you didn't address his point at all. You just repeatedly bickered about small details about one of the points and said he had bad intentions. >Rest of your post isn't worth addressing it's just the same junk. Look who is talking. I wish I could report posters like you, you're the worst.