freejazz

47 ms·

541.
by freejazz 1y ago
> Is anyone really cocksure on the basis of LLM received knowledge? Yeah, the stupid.
542.
by freejazz 1y ago
> copyright on the concept You can't have a copyright in a concept. You can only have a copyright in an expression of something.
543.
by freejazz 1y ago
>They disagree with search engines being fair use? No, with LLMs being fair use. I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post which is a paranoid and pejorative screed based on the fallacy that copyright is predicated on copyin
544.
by freejazz 1y ago
>The key is to not give it any agency over the work product but rather have it act as an editor or advisor that can offer suggestions but every thing that goes into the document is typed by human hands. >Giving it a document and askin
545.
by freejazz 1y ago
I don't think regular people pay attention to copyright decisions (they don't even pay attention to the cases to make it to the supreme court) but there are plenty of lawyers who don't work for media companies who disagree wi
546.
by freejazz 1y ago
That's great for people who write code!
547.
by freejazz 1y ago
Who told you that? ChatGPT? No, not really. It does not help. It evidences that they knew the risks were present but did not take the actions to adequately warn the consumers of its products, which OpenAI knows do not read the entirety of t
548.
by freejazz 1y ago
That's the entire concept of professional licensing, yeah. If you are a licensed professional, you are liable for your work output if it is malpractice.
549.
by freejazz 1y ago
You ever see warning labels on products? That's because putting them in terms and conditions isn't enough to avoid liability in a products liability case.
550.
by freejazz 1y ago
The exact kind of customer I would not want to have anyway.
551.
by freejazz 1y ago
As an attorney, I don't see what the value of that would be if I have to double check its work. How else could I verify that the output is correct?
552.
by freejazz 1y ago
Hiding it in the TOS isn't going to be a good defense from a products liability standpoint
553.
by freejazz 1y ago
Reminder that in the Alsup case, the shadow library was not used for training.
554.
by freejazz 1y ago
>The problem with using this kind of monitor for any work that others will view on their own monitors is that your perception of what looks good will be way off. Really? It's not a problem for photo retouchers, for whom a monitor li
555.
by freejazz 1y ago
> But the idea is that it’s fair use until courts decide otherwise That's certainly an "idea"
556.
by freejazz 1y ago
I'm a lawyer. Many lawyers disagree. It's certainly not a settled matter of law that AI model training is a fair use.
557.
by freejazz 1y ago
>If not, what is the substantial difference here? Well they are completely different systems functioning in completely different ways and only looking at one of the four factors isn't doing any favors.
558.
by freejazz 1y ago
Weird, AI companies insist that AI models are not just indexes but instead something the model has "learned". So, again, to answer my question, it's certainly not a settled matter of law that AI models and/or their &quot
559.
by freejazz 1y ago
How do they get to the conclusion that AI uses are protected under the fair use doctrine and anything otherwise would be an "expansion" of copyright? Fairly telling IMO
560.
by freejazz 1y ago
But its a scam.
561.
by freejazz 1y ago
>"Even if you manage to legally find a way to not get sued"
562.
by freejazz 1y ago
Maybe it's the shit pizza you're used to. The quality has nose-dived the past few years.
563.
by freejazz 1y ago
> the rise of corrupt and totalitarian politicians Doesn't seem to track in the US
564.
by freejazz 1y ago
Yeah, really crazy how when you eat out of a trough, no one asks you for a tip.
565.
by freejazz 1y ago
Where do you live? I've never seen this happen and I'm in NYC... It does not seem to have occurred anywhere else I've traveled in the US
566.
by freejazz 1y ago
Not even veiled misanthropy
567.
by freejazz 1y ago
That's a bit different from the view being pushed "A LOT"
568.
by freejazz 1y ago
>I'm being a bit flippant, but this view is pushed a LOT. Really? That seems like a big stretch.
569.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Disallowing testimony about psychological trauma is consistent with criminalizing intentional attempts to cause it No it's not. IIED is civil law, btw. >and in fact the vast majority of attempts to cause psychological trauma are
570.
by freejazz 1y ago
Where do courts allow unsubstantiated claims? >but also any argumentation or evidence that tries to substantiate the claim (including testimony by expert witnesses in my ideal the version of the rule) in legal proceedings. So you wont al

More ›