3 ms·
>They disagree with search engines being fair use? No, with LLMs being fair use. I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post which is a paranoid and pejo
by freejazz 1y ago
>They disagree with search engines being fair use?
No, with LLMs being fair use. I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post which is a paranoid and pejorative screed based on the fallacy that copyright is predicated on copying being hard or intensive when that was never the case. Copying was always easy. Its the creative part that is hard and why copying was made illegal.
- AnthonyMouse 1y ago> No, with LLMs being fair use. In which case you're responding to the wrong thread. > Copying was always easy. Compare the price of a physically printed book which is in the public domain to the median one that isn't. The prices are only a little lower because the printing and distribution costs are significant. Now compare the price of ebooks in the public domain with ebooks still under copyright. The latter isn't 40% more or 75% more, it's a billion percent more. Infinitely more. Copying went from being a double-digit percentage of the price to being zero.