freejazz

17 ms·

451.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Go smoke some crack
452.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Big turn around from needing good will to something being in their interest
453.
by freejazz 10mo ago
They don't need to have good will, they just need to not do the bad thing.
454.
by freejazz 10mo ago
>If it interferes with their opportunity to engage in their favorite narratives, such as espousing racial ideology, this turn of events can't have done anything except impair that. Yet they did it. >And you don't seem to be
455.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Only one here supposing they would be harmed is you
456.
by freejazz 10mo ago
You should ask them, not me. Maybe also read the article while you're at it.
457.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Yes
458.
by freejazz 10mo ago
What a joke
459.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Exactly.
460.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Is that what you'd do to your sister or mother?
461.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Really? Is that what everyone thought on Instagram? I shouldn't post these selfies, one day someone will turn them into nudes, without my permission?
462.
by freejazz 10mo ago
>It doesn't follow that he has plans "to make women afraid to participate in public life." No, that follows from his other actions
463.
by freejazz 10mo ago
When this poster says "we", they actually mean: "me and other ostriches with their heads in the sand"
464.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Is that supposed to be funny?
465.
by freejazz 10mo ago
>There's a difference between merely existing in public, versus vying for attention And you thought that was a different argument than "you shouldn't have worn that skirt if you didn't want to get raped"?
466.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Weird, I graduated from RIT in 2009 with a B.S. in Applied Networking and Systems Administration and we covered IPV6 quite a bit
467.
by freejazz 10mo ago
"500 years of brutality and slaughter in pursuit of profit" no one said it was peaceful before
468.
by freejazz 10mo ago
> Before the evil Europeans set their greedy eyes on the new world there was peace, love, and ecstasy every single day. That's reading a lot into the other post.
469.
by freejazz 10mo ago
People roll through 4 way stop signs all the time
470.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Because the weather in walking cities is perfect?
471.
by freejazz 10mo ago
> I wonder why no-one's bothered with that before Streetcars?! In San Francsico?!?
472.
by freejazz 10mo ago
That's a non-response response >I honestly wish the human drivers blowing through intersections that night would have done the same. It's miracle no one was killed. A bit deflective, huh?
473.
by freejazz 10mo ago
You could have just said "no" or maybe admitted that "killing" painting was overblown, or maybe that it was not an accurate descriptor at all if you're argument is that it just "changed" painting.
474.
by freejazz 10mo ago
>The problem seems to be that the Waymo cars did exactly as you requested and treated the intersections like 4 way stops but kept getting displaced by more aggressive drivers who simply slowed and rolled. So, you're saying Waymo can
475.
by freejazz 10mo ago
> The difference is the Waymos failed in a way that prevented potential injury No one was injured this time but that's a huge assumption on your part
476.
by freejazz 10mo ago
>Depends, the camera killed painting and is a positive for art in my opinion Have you been to a contemporary art museum?
477.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Weird, I'm an attorney and no one is getting rid of associates in order to have LLMs do the research, no less so when they actually hallucinate sources (something associates wont do). I can't imagine that being significantly diffe
478.
by freejazz 10mo ago
And?
479.
by freejazz 10mo ago
Well you just posted, telling someone else what Zuck's political interests might be, based upon what even you described as meaningless performative behavior.
480.
by freejazz 11mo ago
> Zuck tattooed rainbow flag while Biden was President and is currently macho-man crusader. If Funny how you say this but insist you're not the one being fooled right now!

More ›