3 ms·
> The difference is the Waymos failed in a way that prevented potential injury No one was injured this time but that's a huge assumption on your part
by freejazz 10mo ago
> The difference is the Waymos failed in a way that prevented potential injury
No one was injured this time but that's a huge assumption on your part
- scoofy 10mo agoI mean, yes, if the Waymo's could safely pull over, or even know how to handle every emergency situation, I think that would be better. I'd say that's a big ask though. Training autonomous vehicles for blackouts, fires, earthquakes, tornadoes, hail storms, landslides, sinkholes, tsunamis, floods, or even just fog is not really feasible given that most humans won't even navigate the properly. I'll keep saying it: I'm glad the cars were set to fail-safely when they encountered a situation they couldn't understand. I honestly wish the human drivers blowing through intersections that night would have done the same. It's miracle no one was killed.
- freejazz 10mo agoThat's a non-response response >I honestly wish the human drivers blowing through intersections that night would have done the same. It's miracle no one was killed. A bit deflective, huh?