free_bip

4 ms·

1.
by free_bip 6d ago
They have access to all the same open models that the rest of the world does, so just fine I would think.
2.
by free_bip 6d ago
I'm sure it's not the intended way to play but guessing randomly seems to have a net positive score, so getting a high score is as simple as spamming the buttons as fast as you can. I got 10k on mobile through this strategy.
3.
by free_bip 9d ago
The entire concept of IP-encumbered seeds is cruel and dangerous.
4.
by free_bip 10d ago
I understand if you don't like how the person phrased it, but the goal of the DM was obviously to get the store owner to replace the AI poster. Assuming that they would have gone on a crusade because they didn't pick a "pre
5.
by free_bip 10d ago
Basic economic theory states that only holds if the goods / services being provided are equivalent in the eyes of consumers. It seems self evident here that consumers do not consider them equivalent.
6.
by free_bip 10d ago
Unions also use the threat of striking as a leverage point against corporations. As I noted elsewhere in this thread, there seems to be a common fallacy in this thread of "threat = bad". Laws are threats too. You need a more convi
7.
by free_bip 10d ago
You seem to fundamentally misunderstand what extortion is. It's only extortion if the one extorting is the one receiving the benefit. Hiring a random artist on Fiverr would still make them happy (since the poster is not AI) but would n
8.
by free_bip 10d ago
Extra responsibilities = extra pay 100% of the time. Just because it doesn't happen in practice all the time doesn't make it right.
9.
by free_bip 10d ago
Indeed, artists provide a very valuable service. It's a shame the AI industry feels they're replaceable when they're obviously not.
10.
by free_bip 10d ago
By that definition all laws are threats. And indeed, the fallacy here seems to be assuming that threat = bad.
11.
by free_bip 12d ago
Recent estimates for the number of lives saved annually is actually around 114,000[0]. The number keeps going up because healthcare in the US just keeps getting worse and worse over time. [0]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content
12.
by free_bip 17d ago
Right, the point is we're trying to avoid reverting back to such practices.
13.
by free_bip 18d ago
Do you have anything to back that up?
14.
by free_bip 22d ago
The company that makes the airplane is not normally the company that installs the interior anyways. The airline that buys the plane typically determines what the interior will look like (stuff like ratio of business to economy, overall # of
15.
by free_bip 25d ago
Now we can have John Apple instead of Tim Apple!
16.
by free_bip 25d ago
This is just blatantly false.
17.
by free_bip 1mo ago
I've noticed that the main (socially acceptable) use for AI in entertainment seems to be laughing at how bad it is. When it fucks up something obvious that any human would know not to do. When it does something so insane and out of lef
18.
by free_bip 1mo ago
Tragic news: The worst person you know made a great point.
19.
by free_bip 1mo ago
Most consumers are not an IT department, unfortunately.
20.
by free_bip 1mo ago
We're trying to replace alarm clocks with AI now? Is nothing sacred?
21.
by free_bip 2mo ago
There really needs to be criminal penalties for this kind of behavior. You can't just let autonomous agents hack people through your own negligence and then claim "oh sorry wasn't me" as a defense.
22.
by free_bip 2mo ago
If what you want is the "Why", you're right it probably won't get it right. It'll just give you baseless speculation. But if what you want is the "What" or the "How", I think it can be useful.
23.
by free_bip 2mo ago
By that logic we shouldn't lock up murderers either. After all, it won't help the person who's already dead.
24.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Genuine question here, why would you ask Fable to explain the difference between tusks and teeth? That's a task that can probably be handled by Haiku.
25.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Luckily for you, as far as I can tell you don't have any concrete reason to fear having your repos taken down. Or at least I haven't been given any. If the reason is more emotional than rational ("this feels like it's go
26.
by free_bip 2mo ago
That seems like a completely different concern than what you originally stated? You're not worried about future policies, you're worried about the policy that was just passed. And for what it's worth, it seems like they only
27.
by free_bip 2mo ago
You are effectively saying you do not trust the judgement of the community to accept you long term. Why is that? Is it because you believe there would be a new policy that would exclude your workflow? What would such a policy be? Do you rea
28.
by free_bip 2mo ago
I think this move by Codeberg is lowkey genius. They're trying to build a community based on a set of shared values. Those who disagree with those values are now self-selecting out of the Codeberg community, which is exactly the point
29.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Yes it does. Biometric information (e.g a picture of your face) is famously not nearly as protected under the 4th amendment compared to things like passwords. Anyone opting into this feature is effectively giving any US law enforcement (inc
30.
by free_bip 2mo ago
HuggingFace does not decide who gets charged with crimes. Plenty of people go to prison for crimes the victim didn't want them prosecuted for.

More ›