free_bip

6 ms·

31.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Clearly, a violation of the CFAA has occurred. Now the question is, who should be prosecuted for it? (The answer "nobody" is trivially wrong and should not be considered.)
32.
by free_bip 2mo ago
The reason this was "easy" is because the conjecture turned out to be false. If the collatz conjecture holds true (and most mathematicians seem to think it will), it will be much harder to prove than your average Erdos problem.
33.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Right... So since it's a big problem, shouldn't we at least be considering it as a possibility so that we can minimize the impact?
34.
by free_bip 2mo ago
Agreed. If I'm attending higher education as an adult, I expect to be treated as one. Laptops may be harmful to learning for some students, but may be extremely helpful for others. The university is not the one who gets to decide that
35.
by free_bip 3mo ago
What does NYT's reporting on AI have to do with you? Why exactly is it "playing dirty"? And what about that justifies OpenAI lying to the court (which is a felony crime)?
36.
by free_bip 3mo ago
It's pretty obvious this comment didn't come from a Canadian. Because if it was, you'd know that Palantir is elbow-deep in the Trump administration, the same one that has repeatedly threatened to annex Canada. That is not a t
37.
by free_bip 3mo ago
This Wikipedia article seems completely irrelevant to the quote you posted. They're clearly talking about commercial nuclear energy plants, not orphan sources from radiography and radiotherapy machines.
38.
by free_bip 3mo ago
You're saying this like I would see that 5k in my bank account. If I'm 5% more productive that probably wouldn't even make it into annual review, let alone pay.
39.
by free_bip 3mo ago
If a deal has been reached and the war with Iran is really over as Donald says it is, why is this necessary?
40.
by free_bip 3mo ago
Yes, yes it is impossible. And I'm sure ChatGPT could easily tell you why.
41.
by free_bip 4mo ago
That's weird, I can connect just fine over mullvad.
42.
by free_bip 4mo ago
Or they could lay off some middle managers. If they blame the layoffs on AI the market might even reward them for it.
43.
by free_bip 4mo ago
What an incredibly dismissive and nasty comment.
44.
by free_bip 4mo ago
I didn't even know you could return clothes from most retailers. From online would make sense (you have no way of knowing if it'll fit right), but from a physical store you really don't have an excuse.
45.
by free_bip 4mo ago
What makes you think infra in space is smart? How are you going to dissipate heat?
46.
by free_bip 4mo ago
If you actually read the full text of the law, it states: " "Biometric identifier” means a retina or iris scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or scan of hand or face geometry. Biometric identifiers do not include writing samples, writt
47.
by free_bip 4mo ago
Unfortunately, no pricing or technical information has been released yet.
48.
by free_bip 4mo ago
They can easily add this "individuality" in RLHF. The base model won't know, correct, but the final user-facing model very much can if that's what they so desire.
49.
by free_bip 4mo ago
IMO the big news here is that they created effectively a drop-in replacement for the Leela Chess Zero model - which ended up outperforming the best existing LC0 model. Could make LC0 more competitive long term vs. stockfish if they choose t
50.
by free_bip 4mo ago
I think they would most likely end up calling 911. I hope that Waymos only drive in locations with cellphone signal.
51.
by free_bip 4mo ago
That's not what the previous comment is referring to. They're referring to false positives, i.e "Gemini did not generate this (or process it) yet it says SynthID confirmed"
52.
by free_bip 4mo ago
Those are not the same as prediction markets
53.
by free_bip 4mo ago
So it'll still raise at least 300 million? Sounds like a great thing to me. I dunno why you think it doesn't matter.
54.
by free_bip 5mo ago
It makes more sense when you realize the whole point is to distract from the continued failure to release the Epstein files.
55.
by free_bip 5mo ago
Oh please, the government could easily force them to hand over their research. This is not a serious argument.
56.
by free_bip 5mo ago
You're already watched by security cameras, it's not hard to do facial recognition anymore. And you have companies literally lining up to sell such facial recognition databases. It's conceivable they could determine what pric
57.
by free_bip 5mo ago
Because even an AI chatbot would do a better job than him?
58.
by free_bip 5mo ago
This is highly illegal and could get you extradited back to the US if you're unlucky. Get advice from a real lawyer before doing anything like this.
59.
by free_bip 5mo ago
Right, and without that open bribery they would have had 100% tarrifs on all of their iphones, macbooks and semiconductors, which is an overwhelming portion of their revenue. Now obviously, this only covers a small portion of Tim's rei
60.
by free_bip 5mo ago
Why do you think they got most of their components exempted from tarrifs?

More ›