francoisz

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by francoisz 5y ago

   What put me off the most was that there was no warning: I had to know what DRM meant or run unfree software without realizing it. But, as was pointed out, this is also true of most Linux distrubutions, which is bad. There should be a clea
2. 2.▲
   by francoisz 5y ago

   Most Linux distributions, sadly, yes; good point.
3. 3.▲
   by francoisz 5y ago

   Qutebrowser. I get that the choice is there, people want it and Firefox is still better than Chrome; but (1) Firefox should no longer be advertised as free software; and (2) it should be made abundantly clear what `enable DRM' actuall
4. 4.▲
   by francoisz 5y ago

   I stopped using Firefox the minute I realized that `enable DRM' actually meant `run unfree secret-source software on my computer'. Don't know what this is doing in my distribution's ``free'' package repository
5. 5.▲
   by francoisz 5y ago

   posteo.de