frabjoused

10 ms·

61.
by frabjoused 2y ago
Why does this piece have so many typos? It makes it difficult to read. I ran across 3 and got confused as many times and so stopped reading. Spell check is cheap is 2024.
62.
by frabjoused 2y ago
This week might be the bit flip on his reputation. Starting to see defense comments getting downvoted, when earlier critical comments would get downvoted. Once you pass that 50% opinion it's pretty hard to reverse.
63.
by frabjoused 2y ago
Egregious is a much better word that doesn't intentionally sound alarming. The only new information here is that his signature was on these documents. This article took 18 paragraphs to say that. Real journalism that wasn't influe
64.
by frabjoused 2y ago
No defense of the act here, but how can someone take a publication seriously that states an opinion in the first sentence, and in the 2nd paragraph uses a clickbait modifier like "draconian"?
65.
by frabjoused 2y ago
Isn’t the whole issue that the real action will be too late given our currently technology?
66.
by frabjoused 2y ago
I'm saying use LLMs as preprocessors to form predetermined rankings by URI which weigh into the search. Let the crawler pipe into an LLM.
67.
by frabjoused 2y ago
We don't need self-hosted alternatives (just like the computer market doesn't need Linux tinkerers) as much as we need a real formidable competitor to dethrone Google and create proper website incentives so the Internet stops suck
68.
by frabjoused 2y ago
I still would like to search and not get the dog crap that is Google's Internet, in addition to using LLMs myself.
69.
by frabjoused 2y ago
Has anyone built a search engine that uses LLMs to pre-grade every page with metrics such as: - Commercial bias (content compared to the source, which it learns about) - Insincere motives - Bloat (how many words it takes to say how little t
70.
by frabjoused 2y ago
I agree with this in the sense that once you have enough, you stop caring about the metric.
71.
by frabjoused 3y ago
There could have been just as many or more ridiculous failures in the past, you just didn't have a chance to read about them with your coffee. There’s a ton of reliable published stats and there’s nothing dubious about them.
72.
by frabjoused 3y ago
It’s very easy to objectively see the improvement over time. Just google around and look at some charts from the 60s to today, preferably that relate accidents and fatalities per million flights so it’s properly scaled. Every chart you look
73.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Do you prefer John Oliver anecdotes or numbers?
74.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Google trends has Bitcoin searches at 4x where it was 24 hours ago.
75.
by frabjoused 3y ago
My guess: the API is down, so the client attempts to get all coins and their balance and add them up. Because the API errors, no coins are returned, therefore the balance is 0. It's a bad design because its alarming, and I'm fairl
76.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Tinfoil is unnecessary, Bitcoin hit 64k, all the retail investors are seeing the news and logging in.
77.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Yeah, it took them about 10-15 mins to report it on their status page despite already trending on Twitter and downdetector having 8,000 reports.
78.
by frabjoused 3y ago
I'm more interested in them downranking sites obviously written to game SEO. Like when an article takes 5 paragraphs to answer the one line asked in the H1, or regurgitates the same content as written in 10 other SEO spam articles, jus
79.
by frabjoused 3y ago
I wonder if Google is internally acutely aware of how rapidly its reputation is tanking. I just haven't seen many public acknowledgements of flaws in its search engine, especially in relation to SEO. So I'm very curious if there i
80.
by frabjoused 3y ago
The header "Company claimed its chatbot ‘was responsible for its own actions’ when giving wrong information about bereavement fare" is such a great example of an article giving misleading information to up sensationalism. Later on
81.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Yeah I find GPT too easily tends toward a brown-nosing executive assistant to someone powerful who eventually only hears what he wants to hear.
82.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Check out n8n.io.
83.
by frabjoused 3y ago
That's how it goes! If you're not already doing it, you're going to want to eventually make sure every Run is done independently. Parallel runs between multiple clients isn't going to fly as your load picks up.
84.
by frabjoused 3y ago
I totally agree with that approach, yeah I would ride that vertical until I had the energy/breadth to widen. And over time you'll find what your new user profile wants.
85.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Yeah, I would do either node runs or track CPU time / memory and abstract it to credits, as you were mentioning. Can I ask how your runs are executed? I'm assuming tracking usage is probably trivial, if you're running each pr
86.
by frabjoused 3y ago
That makes a lot of sense. Do you think you'll find yourself widening to more traditional integration and automation use cases? Such as syncing contacts between Monday and Hubspot?
87.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Congrats on the launch! I noticed OpenAI API calls are embedded into your pricing model, which tells me your current use cases are built heavily around AI (and your name). Are you concerned that as you grow, OpenAI is just going to become a
88.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Is a run considered a single step or node in a workflow?
89.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Her third eye on the left of the lenticular lens was interesting.
90.
by frabjoused 3y ago
Can't see a something like "show answers to related questions directly under a single answer to the intended question" being a middle-manager decision.

More ›