foverzar

58 ms·

661.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Free speech does not include using speech to lie and defraud. > If you meet a man lying through his teeth to sell you fake insurance, you do not protect his actions on the basis of freedom of speech. The same rhetorics is used by Ru
662.
by foverzar 5y ago
Why are you repeating a propaganda rhetoric that was designed specifically to target people who don't understand how computer networks and infosec works?
663.
by foverzar 5y ago
Never thought I'd see the day when Russian "Sovereign RUnet" project would actually start making sence.
664.
by foverzar 5y ago
This is a purely wargames matter, so obviously.
665.
by foverzar 5y ago
How was that supposed to work?
666.
by foverzar 5y ago
Wow, who could have thought that people from the other part of the world could have a different perspective!
667.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Historically, there was not much holding back punches between Russia and Ukraine. You may start reading about Holodomor, which is still debated whether it counts as genocide or not. This is such a demagogy and a narrow-sighted view of
668.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Talk of Ukraine joining NATO or the EU was significantly influenced by Russia's invasion of Crimea It was long before that. Ukraine was practically pushed towards joining NATO during Bush Administration using any "soft"
669.
by foverzar 5y ago
But this is obviously untrue. NATO is historically and inherently an anti-Russian alliance. It has been since it's inception. In 90's and 00's Russia has made multiple advancements towards joining NATO, but was dismissed, rea
670.
by foverzar 5y ago
Doesn't seem there is a way to generate curl statement. Pity.
671.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Georgia Georgia is an even more evident example of destabilisation by foreign military–industrial complex than the Ukraine. At least Ukraine had some reasons for her action after Crimea. Georgia (or rather, Saakashvili) decided that if
672.
by foverzar 5y ago
> He has been sitting in a bunker (as Navalny expressed it) for 2 years in fear of the virus, meeting only very few people. Lmao, Navalny wouldn't miss a chance to say something ridiculous like that. Practically all world leaders ha
673.
by foverzar 5y ago
Can you elaborate?
674.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Это будет решаться уже после того, как будет поставлена точка в истории Украины как анти-России The headline seems to be misleading in a "post-war" part, since the language refers to hypothetical future events.
675.
by foverzar 5y ago
I will just give you some context: Most news outlets in Russia nowadays aren't even registered as proper media, so they couldn't care less for any "propaganda filters". The article tries to assert that there is a huge di
676.
by foverzar 5y ago
Look, this is rediculous. Let's just break down what's happening, I am really curious how your logic works: 1. Bob makes a demand, making a press release 2. Alice reports on the demand 3. You claim that Alice is more trustworthy t
677.
by foverzar 5y ago
> on a website under the control of the same agency Your image of the situation is unrealistic.
678.
by foverzar 5y ago
> They are misinformed there and don't even know there are war in Ukraine I think you are the one who is misinformed. We have internet, you know. Srsly, open Telegram, open VK, open 2ch.hk, open any other random forum in ru-net. Whe
679.
by foverzar 5y ago
So basically nothing would change, it's not like it wasn't the case up until now.
680.
by foverzar 5y ago
> They don't have media that talks about the war their country started Stop spreading misinformation, this is not true. This is basically the only thing that all russian-speaking media outlets are talking about. Plus, there is nothi
681.
by foverzar 5y ago
Reliable enough to convey what Russians have to say for themselves. Besides, TJ is more of a blogging platform. I wouldn't trust an opinion of a (wannabe) journalist, but this particular article simply provides all the references and t
682.
by foverzar 5y ago
It's worth noting that Meduza is an extremely opinionated (and thus biased) source.
683.
by foverzar 5y ago
Well that's just chauvinism.
684.
by foverzar 5y ago
Everyone in Russia already knows how to use VPN, how do you think they access RuTracker? xD
685.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Russia objected to Facebook fact checking and labelling (not removing) Russian state media posts False. Facebook had applied restictions on the pages of these media for 90 days and ignored regulators demands to explain and lift these r
686.
by foverzar 5y ago
I don't suppose the structural equivalence actually makes sence here. In practice, there is simply no need to block russian social media as no one actually cares about russian social media, beside Russians and people from other CIS cou
687.
by foverzar 5y ago
> Do people in China and Russia can watch US propaganda easily? Don't know about China, but it's not like people don't go to youtube, reddit, twitter or other social media patfroms. > Why does this exist at all? Like wh
688.
by foverzar 5y ago
Not confirmed. Both mobile internet (yota/megafon) and home internet (mosnet) can access twitter just fine without any VPN. Probably a technical issue. Also, netblocks seems to make false assumptions regarding censorship. Funny thing i
689.
by foverzar 5y ago
Trying to solve an ancient ethnic conflict by force was definitely not the best way to go. Expecting that western countries will start a third world war just to help you get rid of all those inconvenient Russian peacekeepers was simply stup
690.
by foverzar 5y ago
What is "sanewashing"? English is not my native language and I am having genuine trouble locating the definitions. The top 1 result in google is this very linked article.

More ›