foolrush

43 ms·

451.
by foolrush 12y ago
The issue with this line of reasoning is that it avoids complex notions of cyclical reinforcement, as well as lower level, and likely systemic, bias. That is, there are potential ideological underpinnings that lead to the rather by-the-book
452.
Tinkering(mantia.me)
4 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
453.
“[T]he Sony PS-F9 was a battery operated direct drive turntable”(theworldsbestever.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|1 comments
454.
Vietnam's ‘Online Army’(m.bbc.com)
3 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
455.
OkCupid and Facebook Aren’t the Only Ones Manipulating You, but That’s No Excuse(news.vice.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
456.
Finally Google Begins to Think Big (Big History, That is)(landscape.blogspot.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
457.
by foolrush 12y ago
I suspect that the cavalier sentiment OKCupid has approached the discourse with will not go well for them. Will be interesting to observe the sociological takedowns of this post.
458.
by foolrush 12y ago
So well said, and utterly refreshing to read on HN. The framing of all normative experience as male is one invisible aspect to this that few are willing or able to see. “Thus humanity is male and man defines woman not in herself but as rela
459.
by foolrush 12y ago
The reasons _why_ something sounds illegitimate can be ideological. Every single woman could list off a number of things that have been said to her over the course of her life that would sound “fake” due to their horrific content, and relat
460.
by foolrush 12y ago
If you stretch a little, it is possible you can see the inherent enculturation of ideology within your statement. A) Why does it sound “fake”? B) Why would you have to see this in person to believe it? C) Can you see the metanarratives you
461.
Eight Signs A Claimed P≠NP Proof Is Wrong (2010)(scottaaronson.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
462.
Against the Frictionless Interface An Interview with Lori Emerson(furtherfield.org)
12 points by foolrush 12y ago|1 comments
463.
Rules of Dungeons and Dragons Next Have Some Things To Say About Gender Identity(themarysue.com)
7 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
464.
Theory of 'disruption' has been debunked. Can we all move on now, please?(theguardian.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
465.
Innovation Districts: Reshaping Our Cities, Changing Our Economies(onpoint.wbur.org)
1 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
466.
Ask HN: Heideggerian AI / Foucaultian AI?
4 points by foolrush 12y ago|1 comments
467.
by foolrush 12y ago
While plausible, there is an aspect of a filter bubble / confirmation bias you are ignoring that comes with a formal degree. In particular, liberal arts degrees. Being forced to look beyond one's bubble is extremely rewarding. Bei
468.
by foolrush 12y ago
Sadly, a strong argument could be made that the technology sector / startup scene is perhaps one of the most desperate cultures in need of formal liberal arts knowledge. Sexism, invisible privilege, and other forms of uneducated myopia
469.
by foolrush 12y ago
Egads. Slavoj Žižek is not a madman nor even remotely summons your derogatory term “pop”. He is one of the most topical and compelling minds in the Continental Philosophy stream. As any good Continental Philosopher, he highlights the seemi
470.
Linux Journal Editor Accused of Rape(mobile.twitter.com)
9 points by foolrush 12y ago|2 comments
471.
by foolrush 12y ago
See also “Does Language Shape Thought” by Boroditsky, which discusses how perceptions of time are adjusted based on roots in language. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028501... It appear
472.
by foolrush 12y ago
It is serious. It is a deconstructivist line of reasoning that has crossovers into other Postmodernist theory and philosophy such as Foucault’s. The comments, which are worth reading, even brought up Sapir / Whorf as an analogous subje
473.
Feminist Programming Languages(m.hastac.org)
7 points by foolrush 12y ago|9 comments
474.
Google Music Purchases Arrive for Canada(play.google.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
475.
by foolrush 12y ago
Caught on video hitting someone 117 times[1]. This apologetic idea that when men are accused of violence or sexism the “innocent until proven guilty” roll out rubbish is part of the problem. “Guilty until proven innocent” in light of docume
476.
by foolrush 12y ago
The premise functions in a world where one's design ontology permits the separation of “aesthetic” and “design.” Sadly it is nothing more than a rehashing of late Modernist Ludwig Mies van der Rohe's privileged ontogoly peddling.
477.
10 Points of Unsolicited Advice for Tech Writers(thefrailestthing.com)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|1 comments
478.
Internet of Dependent Things(ntlk.net)
2 points by foolrush 12y ago|0 comments
479.
Human flesh-bound volumes R.I.P. on library shelves(thecrimson.com)
1 points by foolrush 13y ago|1 comments
480.
by foolrush 13y ago
However, as is often overlooked, this isn't purely a debate about one's personal ethics and morals; marriage extends into the legal domain, and brings with it a plethora of complex legal ramifications. So, in fact, preventing marr

More ›