fjuerfilis

5 ms·

1.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
Sigh, so true. Heartening that Shor has the same thoughts about the grant system that I do. I don't have quite the same critical perspective as the blogger, but I think there's a certain misguided attitude underlying the phenomena
2.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
I have such mixed feelings about this piece. On the one hand, I'm extremely grateful for it drawing attention to these types of problems with credit. On the other, I feel like it vastly underestimates the scope of the problem. For one,
3.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
The idea of free will sort of deriving from some properties of particles is interesting. I admit there's a lot to our understanding of things from a fundamental physical perspective that is lacking, so although I doubt it's the ca
4.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
Yes, it's the nocebo effect. I personally think it figures prominently in psychosomatic pathologies actually. People with [psycho]somatic symptom disorders, with medically unexplained symptoms, are more likely to report negative side e
5.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
The statement about falsification mechanisms is incorrect. In fact, one of the problems with the Myers-Briggs is that it is continuously brought up in these discussions, even when experts in the area of behavioral individual differences dis
6.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
Yes, I agree that is one model, but what I wrestle with ultimately I suppose is whether indeterminism per se is what defines free will, in part or whole. If you have a prior state that is in part systematic, and part random, is the randomne
7.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
I had a similar reaction. Nondeterministic conceptions of free will similar to that of this paper are really more like an intoxicated state or something, where behavioral outcomes are totally unpredictable. It's the absence of free wil
8.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
Yeah, I agree. I do research on things very closely related to voting systems, and my first thought is approval voting. It's basically rating with two options, approve and disapprove. Has good properties and is relatively easy to under
9.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
I think all of this is generally a step in the right direction but am worried about where it is leading, for two reasons: 1. My experience with the frontiers of open access science in my field have been concerning, in that it seems to feed
10.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
... not a physicist here, but I do research on applied information theory and statistics. This grandfather's paper is sort of interesting to me because it starts to creep into some of my areas of expertise a tiny bit, but he seemed to
11.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
It's worse than that. The current system was tested on 30 people with 50% base rate of lying. Even if they bring it up to 85% accuracy with 50% base rate, by the time you are dealing with base rates that are more realistic, you're
12.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
I'd second that. R and Python both have the same pre-LLVM performance issues. I don't expect either R or Python to go away either time soon, nor would I want them to, but I would like to see people moving to things like Julia and
13.
by fjuerfilis 8y ago
It sounds to me that what is being monetized is the authority of doctors. I think what you've described is really the US healthcare system as a whole. I really don't understand why this isn't more of a focus of discussion.