felipec

11 ms·

61.
Announcing git-fc; a friendly fork of Git(felipec.wordpress.com)
7 points by felipec 13y ago|0 comments
62.
New tool, git-related 0.1(github.com)
2 points by felipec 13y ago|0 comments
63.
The Linux way; never ever break user experience(felipec.wordpress.com)
7 points by felipec 13y ago|2 comments
64.
Advanced Git concepts; the upstream tracking branch(felipec.wordpress.com)
1 points by felipec 13y ago|0 comments
65.
An in-depth analysis of Mercurial and Git branches(felipec.wordpress.com)
1 points by felipec 13y ago|0 comments
66.
What’s new in Git v1.8.4 Mercurial bridge(felipec.wordpress.com)
1 points by felipec 13y ago|0 comments
67.
What it takes to improve Git or: How I fixed zsh completion(felipec.wordpress.com)
2 points by felipec 13y ago|0 comments
68.
by felipec 13y ago
> The people that "broke" (hey, see the quotes?) the user experience you expected and liked are the people that steer the project. They are free to do that, Yes, they have all the freedom to destroy their project.
69.
by felipec 13y ago
> He _hated_ it. We still do.
70.
by felipec 13y ago
> That's cool. Move on. Use what is best for you. You didn't understand the point of the article. Breaking user-experience is the absolute worst thing any software project could do. It goes against the "Linux way".
71.
by felipec 13y ago
> The larger Gnome diaspora has been pretty instrumental in draining the swamp of hardware problems and dumb broken things. True, but not particularly more than KDE, or any other environment.
72.
by felipec 13y ago
Thunar.
73.
by felipec 13y ago
> I think the author is just butthurt about being banned from GNOME's bugzilla I'm not, that happened two years ago, and the only one that lost something there is the GNOME project. There's no point in answering the rest o
74.
by felipec 13y ago
> You get upgrade hell with Firefox extensions too, btw. Not even close to what happens in GNOME 3. Firefox has an extension API, GNOME shell doesn't; that has consequences.
75.
by felipec 13y ago
The author here. I understand that some people have no problems with GNOME 3, that's fine. Based on the evidence I've gathered through the years, my estimate is that half the people that used GNOME 2 liked GNOME 3, and half didn&#
76.
The problem with GNOME 3(felipec.wordpress.com)
76 points by felipec 13y ago|68 comments
77.
by felipec 13y ago
Maybe, but it would be illegal. Just like it would be illegal to send me to jail in Mexico, for something I did in Turkey.
78.
by felipec 13y ago
I don't really care, it's their loss. I'm just bringing this up because of the other post about the other ban.
79.
by felipec 13y ago
I agree. In fact, a warning saying "don't continue this tone or I'll ban you" would have been more than enough. About the tone, I don't think there was any way I could have conveyed my message that their conclusions were wrong in a way they
80.
by felipec 13y ago
I'm bringing it because I saw another guy that was also banned for wrong reasons. I think it's relevant now.
81.
by felipec 13y ago
I was not the one that brought "done" to the discussion, it was Olav and others. That was pretty off-topic, he should have banned himself. Speculation on the other hand is very relevant to the topic. If you accept you arrived at a conclusio
82.
by felipec 13y ago
Yes. Nobody bothered to review the situation ever.
83.
by felipec 13y ago
I didn't act self-centered, I acted as if what I said was true, and I still believe it is. If you say; I've never tried X, but it sucks. I'm pretty certain that's speculation, because you've never tried it, and that's exactly what I told GN
84.
by felipec 13y ago
Whatever happened outside bugzilla should have stayed outside bugzilla. In GNOME's bugzilla I always provided value, and to ban me because of a couple of comments that have nothing wrong is overkill. Do you think it would be fair if a judge
85.
by felipec 13y ago
> "Just stop" sounds like a warning to me. A warning of what? If a person on the street tells you to "stop", your first reaction would be to ask "stop what?", and the answer is "stop chewing gum", to which you reply "but there's nothing
86.
Another user/developer banned from GNOME's bugzilla without any warning(felipec.wordpress.com)
88 points by felipec 13y ago|88 comments
87.
by felipec 15y ago
> My point was: I can swap a spindle disk of the same size with an ssd of the same size and reap all the benefits without changing anything beyond that. And what does that point has to do with anything? > Yes, really. And evidence w
88.
by felipec 15y ago
> This is a false assumption and a flawed comparison. An SSD has the same external interface as a spindle disk. It does have does have different internal properties though that make it superior in almost all use cases though. Wrong. If
89.
by felipec 15y ago
I did not dismiss any use-case. As I said; they are mostly the same. So, if you don't need complex use of branches, you would be fine with either git or mercurial, obviously. But that's a chicken and egg situation; you don't know what you a
90.
by felipec 15y ago
There's no guarantee that new issues will crop up? Well, that's an argument against mercurial as well, is it not? Hell, it's an argument against anything, so I wonder how you can consider it an argument at all. Actually, the word 'guarantee

More ›