3 ms·
> The people that "broke" (hey, see the quotes?) the user experience you expected and liked are the people that steer the project. They are free to do that, Ye
by felipec 13y ago
> The people that "broke" (hey, see the quotes?) the user experience you expected and liked are the people that steer the project. They are free to do that,
Yes, they have all the freedom to destroy their project.
- darklajid 13y agoOh my. You believe that, do you? They don't. They work on something they believe in. Now - that's not a reason to agree by default: Lots of people do things they believe in and fail their social circles or even society. But there's no further point to argue about: Your article was a (poor) rant, your comments here are further proof that you deeply disagree with everything Gnome 3 and still are unable to provide any meaningful comment. I'm trying to put it simple: If Gnome 3 doesn't solve your goals, it's not 'destroying the project'. If a couple of 'Yeah, that's really crap, mate' people agree with you that doesn't magically make you the majority of the userbase, nor does it mean that the developers are wrong and you are right. In all seriousness: After your rant was posted you had only one way to react without digging an even deeper hole: Acknowledge that you were overly aggressive and wrong in quite some points. Instead you continue witih statements like this. English is a foreign language for me, but I think 'to pout' is the verb I'd grab for if I'd need to talk about this comment of yours. Stop complaining, start improving things you care for.