Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fdgsdfogijq
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
The requirements are in the plain english doc
2.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
This is because its difficult to decouple the code from the requirements. And the full requirements are never contained within a doc. So you need an engineer to look at the code to see how its done. This is going to change.
3.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
Someone non-technical can do the requirements gathering.
4.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
The price on this will plummet over the next few years, the economic benefits are too large
5.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
Sometimes I am jealous of these people. They arent doing the corporate grind, and they arent even really doing the startup grind. They are shilling stuff on the internet and avoiding spending their lives working. I know a few, they live gre
6.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
Stock based compensation is a huge drag on their expenses, to the degree that it has hurt their future. "Lyft had some of the best and smartest engineers", whats the bench mark for this? Good looking syntax in a clean code base is
7.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
Lyft was paying engineers 300-450k a year, sometimes with just 2-4 years of experience. This was true even pre 2020. The interviews were just leetcode hards, with an instant reject on not getting the problem right. I feel like a parrot repe
8.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
I think the fact that there are no other systems publicly available that are comparable to GPT-4 (and I dont think Bard is as good), points to innovation they havent released
9.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
I heard Ilya wasnt behind the big innnovations at OpenAI. It was lesser known scientists
10.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
What a glorious downfall of arrogance and smug outdated systems
11.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
Its so you can try to build a business with > 1B valuation.
12.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
Natural language :)
13.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
CDK/Pulumi are going to be used by LLMs to spin up website infra exactly to spec. Devs will fill in the business logic interfaces. Going to be wild
14.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
If you want to be a software engineer, and you arent coding, then yeah its a bad job. Dont let other people convince you otherwise.
15.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
I can tell you that we have applied teams working on open problems, which can be solved out of the box with ChatGPT. Its a huge deal
16.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
I dont work at Google, I think other FAANGS underinvested in this area as they didnt think it was promising. But I will admit, I am suspicious that Google is incompetent. Probably they can come back given how much money they will be forced
17.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
3y ago
I work on a research team in FAANG. What it really feels like is one company made everyone else obsolete. And we are going to work working on NLP models that underperform ChatGPT by a huge margin. Twiddling my thumbs and keeping quiet while
18.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
People should just wear microphones their whole lives, and then dump the audio into an LLM when they die. Then their descendants can talk to them hundreds of years after theyre gone
19.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
The incumbents sense a shift in the power structure that they cant control
20.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
My bet is that there is a bidirectional relationship between medication and mental health. Meaning, teenagers are over medicated which is messing with their heads. Some of them need the medicine, others are unknowingly suffering under some
21.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
Ive seen this even at top software companies
22.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
Once trained, incremental inference costs are very cheap. Instead, everyone will have access
23.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
Big Tech hasnt dominated anything. They got trounced by a 400 person startup. Alexa, Google Search, FB research all spend untold money on ML systems. Neither is releasing game changing products anywhere close to OpenAI.
24.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
Agreed and its a shame you are getting downvoted
25.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
I still cant believe google thought they could ruin the internet like that and continue to dominate search
26.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
OpenAI is crushing it in terms of product strategy
27.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
All these research science bureaucrats at Big Tech could have released LLM models or tried to develop what OpenAI did. But none of them did. We should applaud OpenAI for the innovation and let them do as they please.
28.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
Thats another misconception, there were mortgage backed securities and VC loans in their portfolio. The idea that this was purely about treasuries is another attempt at passing off the buck.
29.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
I interviewed 50+ candidates at a FAANG and never saw a hire
30.
▲
by
fdgsdfogijq
4y ago
Gambles with customer funds -> looses -> passes losses to be bailed out through opaque means. This is really not that different than FTX, except it was legal. The current argument is they were incompetent and fell into some bad bets,
More ›