fckgnad

10 ms·

31.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>I get the vibe you really like ChatGPT :) I'm not in web either. No it's not a "like" thing. Not at all. I neither like it nor hate it. I know you think I'm biased here. But it's actually the other way arou
32.
by fckgnad 4y ago
Many humans suck ass at math too if they aren't taught it at all. chatGPT wasn't trained specifically on math but it can be. I don't see why it needs to be though given that computers already excel beyond humans at math. Read
33.
by fckgnad 4y ago
The resistance involves copyright lawsuits and online bullying to attack people using AI. That's exactly what I mean by "resistance" >I think they're against people scraping their work and on selling it ? I'm not
34.
by fckgnad 4y ago
You realize color theory is bullshit right? Color is a gradient of wavelength. It does not arise from 3 primary colors. Realize that those three colors are picked arbitrarily and placed in some technical framework called "color theory.
35.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>Not to be an ass but they're the most inflammatory sources of news I know, I won't even open an article from "Independent" for my own mental health. omg, then don't click on the link, there's OTHER links I
36.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>I really have no idea what your point is and the kind of hostile "replace you" language is about. It's not intentionally hostile. "Replace All of us and many people outside of coding" is a better term. Apologies
37.
by fckgnad 4y ago
I only pasted a snippet of the conversation. Before my initial query I asked chatGPT directly this: Quality of your software necessarily depends on a constant re-evaluation of customer needs, business priorities, human values, etc. Lot
38.
by fckgnad 4y ago
No, I think we are still in disagreement here. The generative model is capable of replacing you... it just needs proper training. The tech is here but the proper application of that tech hasn't happened yet and we are dangerously close
39.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>No I haven't seen artists complaining much, and I actually have a few in my family. I think you're making this stuff up "complaining really violently". Evidence: https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-art
40.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>I've also not seen anything to suggest it will "git gud" and just replace everyone. You have seen artists complaining really violently about DALL-E and mid-journey right? There's even a law suit. This is happening be
41.
by fckgnad 4y ago
Evidence for the future? Nobody has any real evidence for the future. You don't even have evidence that AI won't get better. I will say that my prediction is more likely given the immense progress of AI over the last decade. If AI
42.
by fckgnad 4y ago
Just for kicks: ME: What if the Hulk was one of your customers? How would you handle him? Give specific and detailed examples. chatGPT: As a language model AI, I do not have any customers or clients, but I can provide you w
43.
by fckgnad 4y ago
ME: Give some more nuanced and specific examples that go way beyond the basics that you described here. chatGPT: 1. Ethical considerations: For example, a developer working on an AI-based medical diagnostic tool may ne
44.
by fckgnad 4y ago
https://www.engraved.blog/building-a-virtual-machine-inside/ This article was "holy shit" all the way through and all the way to the "holy shit" ending. Read to the end. We've just passed a tec
45.
by fckgnad 4y ago
You give an example about how chatGPT is wrong while there exists many examples about how chatGPT is right. And you think the some wrong examples invalidates the possibility of AI ever being better than you? The fact that it's often ri
46.
by fckgnad 4y ago
chatGPT is not a threat. ChatGPT is an omen for the threat that currently exists in the future. A lot of people haven't really played with chatGPT in depth. This thing is next level. It's not just spitting out generic things, ther
47.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>I can't imagine why someone would create a vault dependent on electricity. Same reason why people create doorknobs and car locks that depend on electricity. Also this: https://www.protoolreviews.com/lockdown-logic-v
48.
by fckgnad 4y ago
I bet part of this is a distraction. Someone needed the power out in order to do some random heist job in NC. So they kill power over a vast area. That way motive is virtually impossible to pinpoint. Likely it's some security thing lik
49.
by fckgnad 4y ago
Nobody cares this much to risk everything just to get some extra security on some arbitrary thing. That's like shooting up a school to get more security around schools. Come on.
50.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>There is no logical reason to leave a discussion because what OOP meant to me differs from what OOP meant to you there is reason to do so if you're trolling.
51.
by fckgnad 4y ago
This is how you keep the parties going. Get single and travel to a place with a lot of travelers.
52.
by fckgnad 4y ago
It turned when you decided to pretend that you thought all OOP meant smalltalk style OOP and when you chose to act like you were talking about relations in terms of sets and not sql. You pretended you didn't know the context when it&#x
53.
by fckgnad 4y ago
The sad reality is that no one in this world is entitled to anything. Not even kids. Kids get what they get because of willful charity not entitlement. Some kids get more charity other kids get less, life is unfair. This idea that all kids
54.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>Idealism is the enemy of done and I care about done Nobody is talking about idealism. It's all practical. What my claim is this: You are wrong. In both cases you can get things "done" but you'd get things done faster
55.
by fckgnad 4y ago
You are being pedantic by virtue of even turning the conversation in this direction. Stop trolling.
56.
by fckgnad 4y ago
Can't prove if it's true of all software. But examples of categories of this type seem to exist. Linux and blender are two examples. The software never gets to total nirvana. What happens is it gets to a state of nearly nirvana su
57.
by fckgnad 4y ago
I think though that there's an apex all game engines reach where technological progression just slows down even when you have millions of developer dollars to throw at it. It's the reason why something like blender can catch up wi
58.
by fckgnad 4y ago
I like how they address their own short comings. This is markedly different to a lot of Linux fanatics in the past. (Though I will say for Linux the ux is truly becoming more and more on par with a closed source a os)
59.
by fckgnad 4y ago
>I expect that deviation is why we're having trouble communicating here. No the deviation is deliberately manufactured here. The oop pedantism is obvious. Smalltalk was the first but the word as evolved, everyone knows that. Includi
60.
by fckgnad 4y ago
Some tools are garbage. But according to the logic you present here such a universe with garbage tools doesn't exist, even a piece of shit has some sort of use in programming. "best tool for the job" is a niave and illusory s

More ›