falsedan

19 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   for googlebot, naturally
2. 152.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   looks fine on iOS Safari here
3. 153.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   I'd say 'more mechanical' instead of easier, but yeah, pretty much
4. 154.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   I guess, with a oneline description like that, I expected a project minter like cookiecutter or dzil new (or yeoman), but the more I read, the more this looks like make without the dependency resolver
5. 155.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   Is this a make reimplementation
6. 156.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   Review Board is a Django-based code review tool, like if you had a separate service for merging PRs in Github? It does a lot of things wrong (e.g. doesn't keep track of commits in a change request, flattens all the changes) and 2 or 3
7. 157.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   Yeah this sucks. the egoless approach is to suck it up and do the changes, but also to raise with the team the difference between feedback for implementing the feature & expressing opinions. One thing I liked about Review Board (!) was
8. 158.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   So I guess I was pretty condensed in my post: > mindless automatically-generated the 'mindless' is: solving is mindless application of heuristics/solving rules & the challenge is not to complete the puzzle but to do
9. 159.▲
   by falsedan 7y ago

   how did telcos manage to run a message product (SMS) for the 20 years before Google? The user-base is bigger than 1.5B too
10. 160.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    I remember when Amazon fucked up and signed a contract with the worst local courier company in the UK; they were locked in and couldn't back out. So the advised people who'd previously had poor service from those couriers to put &
11. 161.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    people feel bad about publishing a PR and being told "don't do it like this" and get defensive, argue about the sunk cost, throw references justifying why their approach is Good Actually, accuse the reviewer of not being seri
12. 162.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    I had a similar experience but with Three, using my usual data allowance. Making local calls was outrageous but that's what voice chat apps are for. When I moved to the US I agonised for months about getting a local number vs. just kee
13. 163.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    also: disable the transceiver and stop lighting the screen, to save power since you're not using your phone maybe there could be a dedicated switch for it
14. 164.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    > You mean "over", not "or"? clarification: I mean what I wrote. I tried the author's game and found it lifeless and too much work, the worst combination of attributes from my two preferred puzzles styles I des
15. 165.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    > And for a game like this, there's really no point in trying to make those puzzles by hand. That's a job for a computer. A hundred good puzzles with a difficulty ramp-up would be way preferable than 100 randomly-generated &#
16. 166.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    Oh sweet child, no. Maybe: planned an offsite
17. 167.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    > (I count 21 total not 22) lol tyop , I also count 21
18. 168.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    > One could also argue (maybe?) that Turing's "equivalency theorem" lol wat did you talk like this to the CS masters, no wonder they left
19. 169.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    ^_^
20. 170.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    how many of them did you exercise in the last 6 months/5 years I'm 5/7 out of 22, +2 if I go back a decade or two
21. 171.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    Oops, mirror clone only includes reachable commits. No idea what the 'Otherwise' clarification means then, it sounds bogus
22. 172.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    with the communication skills I've seen so far, probably not
23. 173.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    > include whitespace and brainfuck make part of the test a reverse question where the interviewers have to work out what language your solution is in 1:v!`*5*54p2*62*77,*5< v _@>v >v>:#<.>1+:2^ >:3%|>:
24. 174.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    shit, I'd have to look up NAND gates. also: that's EE, not CS.
25. 175.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    > Otherwise, you can still clone the repository and make use of: git reflog or git fsck to find your last commit and change the HEAD. I don't understand: when I clone a repo, I get a copy of all the branches/tags and the comm
26. 176.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    I usually couch git intros with "git was designed for linux kernel developers to get their work done, specifically filesystem developers, specifically Linus, so a lot of things won't make sense unless you approach it from the mind
27. 177.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    yeah exactly, all the FUD about rebase and shared branches is baffling to me. are people regularly getting stuck on 'git pull --rebase' and slamming into merge conflicts?
28. 178.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    I spent some time with `git mergetool` to help resolve conflicts. It's hideous but it's better than staring at inline conflict markers
29. 179.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    ex-designer I thought
30. 180.▲
    by falsedan 7y ago

    My point is, git doesn't let you edit history; it lets you make branches easily & the original history remains unaltered. It's trivially easy to detect altered history, and talking about 'editing history' gives the i