Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
falcolas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
121.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
If SCOTUS made the ruling, then the process worked as intended, even when the Cheveron deference was part of that process. Even when written by congress, not all laws that pass will pass judicial review. > The current best course of acti
122.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
You live as a part of society, your liberty is going to be offended with every step you take. You're taxed. You're required to maintain your rental properties to a certain standard. You're required to have a license to dr
123.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> But I don't see anything in there that say they have the ability to mandate unlocking. That's because cell phones didn't exist when the FCC mandate was created. So no, you won't see cell phones (or attributes of cel
124.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
The combination with a different decision to remove the statute of limitations for new companies on old regulations does indeed make this a bit of a "doom" scenario. The courts are already backing up with these lawsuits, and it&#x
125.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> There was no legal basis for this I pointed this out in a separate comment, but there is absolutely a legal basis for this. The CDC is the Center for Disease Control (emphasis on control), and so it's absolutely in their mandate t
126.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
I think the change is just going to be the courts utterly tied up with regulation challenges. The FDA, FCC, FAA et.al. can still write regulations on Congress' behalf, but they no longer have the final say, and the courts don't ha
127.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
Yes, the law did allow the FCC to mandate unlocking. They were given the ability to write regulations - which are a form of law - on behalf of Congress within their stated mission. Just as, to use your food analogy, the FDA wrote regulation
128.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> Part of my job as a father is helping her develop her intellectual stance on "hearsay". And what stance will you set with them to avoid discussing sexual orientation (or religion) when they report that their friend Austin has
129.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> The ideas contained within whatever book would not pop up on her mind out of thin air You say that as if your child won't hear about these topics from their peers. Some of whom will have lesbian or gay parents. Some of whom will b
130.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
In some cases yes you do. It depends on how the account is flagged, I'm not sure what the flag is, but valid links can and do return a 404 if you're not logged in. You also can't view replies or context for individual tweets,
131.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
I have also used these, and they are crazy awesome for this specific usecase. Shokz Openswim. The "Pro" version also offers bluetooth connectivity.
132.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
A solution, funny enough, is to get a cheap android phone and don't connect it to a network. It's inexpensive, the storage is expandable, you can still get Spotify et.al. installed and running on it, it provides USB-C and bluetoot
133.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> There is no emergency I can think of that either can't wait till lunch Respectfully, most parents I've met do not agree with you. And I don't think that the random events like school shootings and bomb threats have helpe
134.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
My own experience with nieces nephews and niblings agrees that it's pretty much this. It's more about the parents' wishes than the children's demands. Phones are powerful tools. Ideally kids would learn how to use them p
135.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
Not to drag this out in the mud, but that 5% is filled with some really nasty legislation and policies. And yes, I'm mostly referring to Republican lead legislation that encourages or enforces conversion therapy, minority disenfranchis
136.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
I agree; if they're going to implement the feature, it would be awesome if adults could opt into it as well.
137.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
Minors - under 18.
138.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
The TL;DR: for "addictive feeds" is basically blocking a feed that is built based on their previous interactions with posts (whether associated via the device or the account). Doesn't impact searches or followed feeds. So, yo
139.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
Ticketed, no. Hit by traffic which is all going 30 over, yes.
140.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> Their main concern - latency - turned out to be a non-issue. I'm not fortunate enough to live near a Google (or Microsoft) datacenter. So latency in cloud gaming is a very real issue. I'm glad for those who could use it lag f
141.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
Please no. 30fps will actually give me eye strain after awhile. 60 FPS at least, please. And no, 24fps film is not comparable to 30fps, because the film captures a smear of time, whereas computers/consoles do not.
142.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
I recently got the rulebook for a Wizard of Oz TTRPG. It re-uses the D20 system, but everything else about it (including all the spells, races, monsters, etc) are new.
143.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> You can definitely cause accidents without technically committing a traffic violation. Yup. Just drive the exact speed limit on every highway you're on. And if you're on larger width highways, you can do that in the left lane
144.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> I’ll miss the old Grumman LLVs though. They are the post office to me, being there basically all my life. Such an unmistakeable symbol. But it’s time has come. Living in a rural area, the mail car was a right-hand-drive station wagon w
145.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
1k pills here, but I can only take one once a day. They're really hard on the stomach, and even when taken with food. A second pill (which my doctor would like to see) just always makes me puke.
146.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
Battery anxiety is real, at least here in Montana. I don't have my supercharger adapter yet (been 6 months, probably be another 6 months at this rate), and the only chargers that were available to me on my last trip were the Level 1 ch
147.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> Woman have not been held accountable for promiscuity for the last 50 years and the results are just in: it has destroyed society. Sex is a two-person activity. If you really believe it's destroyed society, you have to put equal bl
148.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
It depends on how interesting the thing I'm needing to focus on is. If it's super interesting, I just block out external stimuli, since it will actually aggravate me. The flip side is if I'm doing something boring, I have to
149.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
> I can be fall down drunk 24x7 the whole 10 months my wife is pregnant. Not going to affect the baby. Ironically, it probably will. Having a husband be that drunk would likely stress the mother, which does indeed affect the baby. > A
150.
▲
by
falcolas
2y ago
No, they certainly do not. But they are directly involved in causing pregnancies. They are directly involved in the cause of everything a woman goes through prior to giving birth.
More ›