fabiospampinato

8 ms·

31.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I don't know why people put any stock in this index, the methodology seems flawed. They say that Ada's rating is double that of TypeScript, surely that doesn't reflect reality in the slightest?
32.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Not really like that, because never at any point 7B people on this rock were farmers.
33.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
You just kind of concatenate the entire codebase into one file, tell the model to do something and output the modified codebase into another file, diff the two and produce a patch automatically.
34.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
That difference in the snippet you mentioned has 100% to do with how Solid is compiling its JSX, and 0% to do with how signals must work. If you don't like what Solid is doing you may consider it a self-inflicted wound, nothing is forc
35.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I mean if one's time is worth approximately $0/hour then I stand corrected and indeed Copilot is more expensive than chatGPT.
36.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Copilot is useful because the cost to ask it something is effectively zero. If you have 2 lines of boilerplate code to write you aren't going to ask chatGPT to write it for you because just asking it costs more than solving the problem
37.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
By and large having no VDOM frees you from having to structure things in an unergonomic way, for performance or otherwise, whatever limitations Svelte and Solid have in this regard are self-inflicted. For example my framework allows you to
38.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Things like Solid ( https://www.solidjs.com/ ) also have no virtual DOM, and the improvements are in higher ceiling for performance, lower memory usage, simpler DX (components are not re-executed, there aren't any depend
39.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
> Even SolidJS hasn't quite crept the performance Inferno has managed to achieve. I see Solid to the left of Inferno in that benchmark, though they are very close indeed. Solid's code looks weird in its own ways I guess, but it
40.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
That's an interesting comparison because: - Svelte is actually strangely slow, I mean there's *one* interesting optimization that having a custom compiler/transform allows you do to for free, which is deep cloning nodes in on
41.
The truth about CSS selector performance(blogs.windows.com)
1 points by fabiospampinato 4y ago|0 comments
42.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
At this point one of the main features I look for in a JS framework is whether its author values type checking like I do or not.
43.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
That's available already, in Bun.
44.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Ok, but then I don't understand the claim that it's faster than React while using React. I don't know of any more specific and good benchmarks for that.
45.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Thanks for the link, interesting. I'd still recommend making a submission for js-framework-benchmark, otherwise it's kinda like preact signals, where the performance aspect of them is kind of a marketing aspect really, and they do
46.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I'd like to see how it performs in js-framework-benchmark. That it's faster than emotion or styled-components don't really mean anything when comparing the frameworks themselves, and much faster css-in-js solutions can be wri
47.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
2x performance in what benchmark? React seems less than 2x slower than painfully optimized vanilla code in js-framework-benchmark, even considering the "swap rows" test, which is not that important but where React does terribly in
48.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
It's not possible to just switch to SWC, all the Babel plugins that you use would need to be rewritten for SWC also. As far as I know there's only one Svelte compiler and it's written in JS.
49.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
There are two types of fenced code blocks, and the one most people write, the one with backticks, basically can't be written in some languages because their keyboards like a backtick key.
50.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I'm not sure if the DOM is that slow actually, compared to raw code that can output at any time manipulating the DOM only has produce an update within the next frame for an external observer to perceive it as as fast as possible basica
51.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
If needed you can make your own map that doesn't let you down: https://www.npmjs.com/package/infinity-map
52.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Not true for end to end encrypted stuff, the server can't reset anything.
53.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
fwiw I got kind of different results, first time around 1800 fide, second time around 1900 fide, third time, the only time I managed to win, around 1500 fide.
54.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I tried it, queen and bishop to the same square, they captured each other and disappeared off the board!
55.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I played some 10 games or so, before I couldn't reach the server anymore. Pretty fun, I like it! I'm going to try it tomorrow with a friend of mine that's about my level and see how it goes, hopefully those practice games wil
56.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Is there any actual proof that Turbopack is 10x faster than Vite at anything? I can't find any benchmark showing it.
57.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Still no regex lookbehinds, I dream of the day when (if) they'll ship in Safari.
58.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
It all makes sense once you understand that they are trying to confuse us as much as possible.
59.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Equivalent to a milli library
60.
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
I love this idea. I just tried with a package.json of mine and 33% of the money seems to go to Microsoft/TypeScript, which seems odd for a bunch of reasons: they don't seem to have Github Sponsors setup, they don't seem to ha

More ›