3 ms·
Copilot is useful because the cost to ask it something is effectively zero. If you have 2 lines of boilerplate code to write you aren't going to ask chatGPT to
by fabiospampinato 4y ago
Copilot is useful because the cost to ask it something is effectively zero. If you have 2 lines of boilerplate code to write you aren't going to ask chatGPT to write it for you because just asking it costs more than solving the problem yourself.
- ClapperHeid 4y ago>Copilot is useful because the cost to ask it something is effectively zero... Copiolot requires you to enter payment details, to access the trial period. ChatGPT is available to use for free, as long as you're prepared to put up with the fact access may not always be instantly available during busy periods. So the reality is the reverse of what you say.
- elashri 4y agoI think the comment means coet in terms of time not money
- fabiospampinato 4y agoI mean if one's time is worth approximately $0/hour then I stand corrected and indeed Copilot is more expensive than chatGPT.
- faeriechangling 4y agoIf I have a 10-100 line script to pump out, these days I don’t bother using an IDE + copilot I’m going to ask ChatGPT to do it and never leave the console until it gets it right. Then I might use chatgpt to draft up an email afterwards. This makes me feel like it’s copilot that’s the one forcing me to disrupt my workflow rather than the other way around because ChatGPT already is being used so heavily by me.