ex-aws-dude

3 ms·

1.
by ex-aws-dude 5d ago
You have to throw in “load bearing” in the request though to avoid suspicion
2.
by ex-aws-dude 7d ago
How can you not need maps? That’s crazy to me
3.
by ex-aws-dude 7d ago
The homer simpson car
4.
by ex-aws-dude 7d ago
OMG THEY CHANGED THE FONT, TOP OF HN!!!
5.
by ex-aws-dude 8d ago
> anyone producing content, everyone’s creativity, is fed by something that others did before The thing I produce does not replace demand for the original though? I can’t recite the original for a million people
6.
Ask HN: What exists if I want a premade SoC/MCU/screen/enclosure/battery?
1 points by ex-aws-dude 8d ago|1 comments
7.
by ex-aws-dude 10d ago
Isn't that a challenge with RL anyway that for a lot of problems its hard to even know accuracy continuously for each step
8.
by ex-aws-dude 11d ago
Nah there's a lot of reasons to prefer physical * You own it forever * Nothing to charge * Don't have yet another screen to stare at * Its the definitive way to collect books (similar in the sense of vinyl for music) * Going to us
9.
by ex-aws-dude 11d ago
Why would buying it even prevent that, OAI is just going to accidentally hack someone else
10.
by ex-aws-dude 12d ago
The thing is searching an associative memory for similar solutions and predicting what will work is not that far off conceptually from what humans do I don’t think LLMs will reach the same level as humans but I would argue it is still a for
11.
by ex-aws-dude 12d ago
Putting LLMs in loops with tool calls has created tons of emergent behaviour beyond simply being a search tool
12.
by ex-aws-dude 12d ago
I never understand when people say that, isn’t it obvious that intelligence is an emergent phenomenon that could arise in different ways
13.
by ex-aws-dude 13d ago
You can already look back at similar concerns for early GPT
14.
by ex-aws-dude 14d ago
But it’s not like someone is going to expend massive energy without any financial return These problems are just for marketing for the time being Maybe the worries of the field of math being “over” are a bit overblown since a lot of pure ma
15.
by ex-aws-dude 14d ago
That’s something I don’t see much discussion about They spent millions to solve this problem but it’s not like someone is going to pay that for every problem Won’t progress still be limited financially?
16.
by ex-aws-dude 14d ago
The thing is no one is stopping anyone from getting the same knowledge/understanding/insight If those things are disincentivized because the original problem is “solved” and there is less prestige to motivate people doesn’t that s
17.
by ex-aws-dude 15d ago
I think this is another level because AI affects the actual job of programming regardless of domain which is not the case with blockchain Even if you don't use AI you may still have to review co-workers using it Whereas blockchain was
18.
by ex-aws-dude 16d ago
I don’t understand why building an app twice is a big deal in the first place if that’s a core part of your business Like wouldn’t you want to invest in platform specific expertise long term? It’s not like this is a small company or it’s ju
19.
by ex-aws-dude 17d ago
How many times do HN users have to be told they are not the majority? If you look at phone sales Pro Max out-sells the regular Pro Regular people like big phones
20.
by ex-aws-dude 17d ago
I don't think the price is that crazy considering how often you use your phone What other item do you own that you spend so many hours using
21.
by ex-aws-dude 17d ago
The guy did use OpenAI
22.
by ex-aws-dude 17d ago
In other words it’s turtles all the way down
23.
by ex-aws-dude 17d ago
I see and is there only 1 layer of relations? Or does it accumulate the relations like A relates to B, so also add in B's relations
24.
by ex-aws-dude 18d ago
I don't know much about LLMs but does that mean you have N^2 computation with the context size since every token needs to track how it relates to every other token?
25.
by ex-aws-dude 18d ago
> Tristan have no concrete evidence that OpenAI accessed their session. Its not about accessing the session, its whether the session ended up in the training run for the next version of the model That's normal practice for these mod
26.
by ex-aws-dude 18d ago
With these massive Lean proofs how do we know the model didn't just find some bug in Lean and exploit it? We've seen in the past they will go to any means to satisfy the desired outcome
27.
by ex-aws-dude 22d ago
To ask a dumb question is there any chance there can be a bug in these generated proofs that makes it think its true? Or is it the case that as long as you verify the initial statements you are trying to prove the rest doesn't matter
28.
by ex-aws-dude 22d ago
Based on the hackiness of the claude code leak as well I get the impression that openai/anthropic have world class experts in ML but lack regular software expertise
29.
by ex-aws-dude 22d ago
They can do new tasks with in-context learning but its obviously limited by context window
30.
by ex-aws-dude 22d ago
In the future: "I went ahead and built the database you requested using today's tool sponsor: Firebase"

More ›