eviks

15 ms·

421.
by eviks 7mo ago
Lessons learned for the 3rd term!
422.
by eviks 7mo ago
Are there good explanations/demos comparing this to msdf?
423.
by eviks 7mo ago
How does bad UI make a lot of sense?
424.
by eviks 7mo ago
Almost never, indeed, so you need some 3rd party trash utilities with databases and heuristics. Though that's also on the gardener and his bad OS design where forced compartmentalization is's trivial, the weeds will never want to
425.
by eviks 7mo ago
And my point is that all this 'core capability' stuff is not relevant to the discussion of good UI, similarly the fact that GitHub has Pull Requests doesn't help when it's bad UI that needs "stack" reinventing.
426.
by eviks 7mo ago
That's not "easily". Easily would be: you drag your commit(s) from one place to another or copy/paste to achieve the same
427.
by eviks 7mo ago
> Why would I want to build on changes that haven't been reviewed and accepted? Not to waste time not being able to do anything that depends on those changes? > git and most accepted development workflows are linear. Linear like
428.
by eviks 7mo ago
"Anyone that cannot spend $40+ to give every FOSS maintainer a smartcard and maybe even separate machines for releases and make the more secure workflow truly 5 minutes has absolutely no business widely depending upon FOSS"
429.
by eviks 7mo ago
> something on my system was out of date. i installed the missing item Given the "extreme vigilance" of the primitive "don't install unknown something on your machine" level is unattainable, can there really be a
430.
by eviks 7mo ago
It tells us nothing about the important and relevant part - education It tells us almost nothing about the unimportant any irrelevant part - how a few individuals choose to raise their kids
431.
by eviks 7mo ago
> Apple, a company that traditionally favors simple functionality but not being able to interact with an icon is DISfunctionality, though yes, a simple one. So that principle can't explain the bad design either.
432.
by eviks 7mo ago
which, in this case, is a paper book
433.
by eviks 7mo ago
> whether the digitalization of classrooms had been evidence-based There is no indication that the current opposite move is evidence-based either, so it's basically your typical vibe shifts. Might revert back to "digital basics
434.
by eviks 7mo ago
> You cannot open a new tab to Youtube in a book If such a basic distraction in a digital device isn't fix, it means the experiment wasn't even tried!
435.
by eviks 7mo ago
Don't speak in empty slogans, connect it to the article/comment! Some app does some thing, then the OS reverts it! Where is "you" and "own" in this process? Do you own the "C:\Windows\SYSBCKUP" folder
436.
by eviks 7mo ago
Now try a 3rd comment that actually connects to the design deficiency described in the article instead of a generic grievance about rearchitectrue that included a gazillion of changes
437.
by eviks 7mo ago
The biggest cause for this problem isn't lack of docs, but poor OS design. Like, why would you let apps change anything without restrictions to begin with? Of course, then you have to have some dumb hidden folder wasting space to resto
438.
by eviks 7mo ago
What is "next gen" about it, is it "just" fine-grained reactivity? Or is this opposed to prev gen of Rust web UI libs, which were...? Couldn't find it in the book quickly, and it seems to not even have search...
439.
by eviks 7mo ago
Again, why not? Do you not want the results to have less seo garbage? Or not have AI hallucinate in your face blocking useful results? I don't get it. I mean, I understand that you don't have recourse now, but I don't underst
440.
by eviks 7mo ago
This broad reclassification makes no sense. If you put literal eggs in 5 baskets, then any of them falling down will disrupt your eggs in some way. You're missing the whole point of the principle, which is that it will not disrupt
441.
by eviks 7mo ago
Do you not value relevance in your search results???
442.
by eviks 7mo ago
No, the root problem is you put all the eggs in one basket ignoring the folk wisdom that predates anything digital > Don't keep anything in a cloud service that you couldn't live with losing, unless you keep a local backup. Tra
443.
by eviks 7mo ago
None: your me@NonSelf-HostedMail.com simply wouldn't know about your account at AI.com, so you'd only have your AI account banned
444.
by eviks 7mo ago
How does giving data out for free, no cents involved, match with your template?
445.
by eviks 7mo ago
They do exactly the same as when the people are around to receive the unbearable punishment of... promising the company will follow the law > OkCupid and Match do not have to pay a financial penalty in a deal made with the FTC over an in
446.
by eviks 7mo ago
But this time it's permanent !
447.
by eviks 7mo ago
Yes, the logic you're missing is "protect the children"
448.
by eviks 7mo ago
> I would never do business with Google. All I use from them is search. That's it. Nothing else. Given that's their main business and they are likely to graveyard whatever domain penny business you've got burnt by anyway,
449.
by eviks 7mo ago
Are you not aware of a million of dedicated competitive services for each of this to jump to "self-hosting" as the only alternative? > All my emails, all my documents saved in Google Drive.
450.
by eviks 7mo ago
Do they love their competitors so much to cripple their own service?

More ›