Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
engineercodex
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
engineercodex
2y ago
We all know this isn’t replacing doctors. We do know that when applied correctly, this will assist doctors and other clinical specialists in their work. With doctor burnout at all time highs, I think stuff like this is amazing.
2.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
I could see that, and I wouldn't want LLMs just generating tests willy-nilly with no human oversight. I don't have any trust in the reasoning ability of LLMs at all. Rather, I prefer to view LLMs as a junior dev that submits PRs t
3.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
You're right. I've edited my wording to be more realistic about the value of the test. I believe you're right that the test is not an outlier in terms of value provided. Some of my comments within the article are more aspirat
4.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Good point! I used exponential to emphasize the nature of the value of a certain test compared to the rest of the generated tests, but you're right it's not the right word. I updated the article to remove the usage. :)
5.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Quality has to be backed my metrics or else it will never happen. PS. Big fan of this person’s recent blog posts. He’s been on a roll!
6.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
I inserted these because I personally like reading related discussions and articles of topics at hand. Not sure how this is a negative :/
7.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Ouch - half of the article (the "Actionable Takeaways" section) was my own commentary. The summary was for those who didn't want to necessarily parse through the entire paper's PDF. Happy to listen to any constructive fe
8.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Hey! Thanks for your comment - I'm the one who wrote this article. I wasn't trying to say that the paper authors talked about "unexpected edge cases" or "thinking outside the box." I edited the post to be more
9.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
This makes so much more sense now. Thanks for investigating
10.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
I don’t really understand this comment. I didn’t “slap” any date on top of the article. 2 Oct 2023 is the date I published my article. (This is how blogs on the Internet work.) The first line of the article says that this all happened in 20
11.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Correct. This is a retrospective of an artifact from the early 2010s. The architecture is much different now.
12.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
I’m the writer of this. I linked to this presentation very clearly throughout the article as a source. This was an article meant to resurface learnings from something that happened a decade ago, with added images and a clear distillation so
13.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Try brilliant.org or swequiz.com Watch some YouTube videos or read some CS articles. If you have a project idea, break down the next steps into tiny actionable tasks and draw out how you would implement certain features.
14.
▲
Leave work slightly unfinished for easier flow the next day
(read.engineerscodex.com)
244 points
by
engineercodex
3y ago
|
104 comments
15.
▲
Takeaways for developers from the OpenAI saga: a multi-model strategy
(engineercodex.substack.com)
1 points
by
engineercodex
3y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
Show HN: Sparksnip – Like Apple Notes, but for the Web
(sparksnip.com)
3 points
by
engineercodex
3y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
A lot more founders and employees are heavily diluted than you think. I always just assumed massive exits meant people were rich. But when I calculated out how much an exec would make for a diluted $1B exit compared to working at FAANG for
18.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Really great idea! I built something similar for myself but this is looks much much nicer than mine :)
19.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
You should do a Show HN!
20.
▲
Facebook scaled Memcached to handle billions of requests per second (2013)
(engineercodex.substack.com)
2 points
by
engineercodex
3y ago
|
0 comments
21.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
While X hasn't been dying just yet, I think this would probably kill it. The value of X comes from both the creators and the free users and lurkers. If it's just full of creators and die-hard lurkers, the value decreases a lot for
22.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Incremental improvements add up to big things over time.
23.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
I barely use Bard, but I do use the Search Generative Experience and the Bard-in-Google Docs quite a lot. I find both quite useful as they integrate quite well into my daily workflow.
24.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Sorry you didn’t like it dude. If you have any constructive feedback, that’d be more helpful.
25.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Author here. Comments like this make my day, so thank you! I’m trying to find old software engineering gems and explain them as simply as possible, so I’m glad you found it simple to understand. Also, it’s definitely possible to make a clon
26.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Author here. No ChatGPT was used. Just my own brain reading through old talks and articles from Instagram engineering and Excalidraw for the diagrams. I did my best to put together all the info I learned from them into a comprehensive and
27.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Sources are linked at the bottom of the article!
28.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Any TLDR for those of us who don’t have a subscription?
29.
▲
by
engineercodex
3y ago
Probably any of the large tech companies? Engineers are the most expensive there since they get paid very well there. AI making engineers more efficient theoretically means they would need less of them. But I don’t think AI will replace eng