3 ms·
I don’t really understand this comment. I didn’t “slap” any date on top of the article. 2 Oct 2023 is the date I published my article. (This is how blogs on th
by engineercodex 3y ago
I don’t really understand this comment.
I didn’t “slap” any date on top of the article. 2 Oct 2023 is the date I published my article. (This is how blogs on the Internet work.)
The first line of the article says that this all happened in 2012. I’m not sure I could get any clearer there.
The “GPT distillation” phrase is pretty rude. Anyone reading the article can see the difference between it and the presentation. Every “hand-drawn” image in the article is created by me in Excalidraw, and any images from the presentation are sourced with a very clear link to the presentation.
If you have any constructive feedback, I am happy to listen and take it into account.
Otherwise, I’m not really a fan of the rudeness. Thanks.
- ramijames 3y agoDon't worry about it man. Some people just like to complain. Don't take it to heart. I found it interesting and valuable. It doesn't matter if the base content originated from another source. I would never have seen that original content. I saw this. It's ok.
- jasonwatkinspdx 3y agoI missed the original InfoQ presentation so this post was definitely useful to me. In particular I'm working on something related to the clustering vs simple sharding dilemma so finding another big name use case is quite helpful. Thanks and don't let the haters get you down.