Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
emteycz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
121.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
No, I don't get a less stressful life, I'd get a much more stressful one. One, maybe two years I earn a lot, and then 2-5 years next to nothing. I must plan my life according to the needs of my mental health, not fiscal calendar
122.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
> Because as a tech worker your salary is likely already well above the level that it would need to fall in order for us to achieve meaningful level of wealth equality (not complete equality, but equal-ish) Why would you want that??? I t
123.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I don't feel special because the same thing applies to every programmer I know. How could I in any way feel special when I'm just the same as others? I said it because I wanted you to feel how the market is, not because it makes m
124.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I don't see it as greed, I see it as rejection of corporate greed at their expense. Why should a corporation make more money from your work when others like you are not giving them as much?
125.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
You must be very young, I remember when mobile phones had Ni-Cd batteries and it was very bad (you could even casually destroy your battery by charging it incorrectly!). Li-Ion felt like a huge revolution, and the improvements it had since
126.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Neoliberalism calls for elimination of social services? I know it as the exact opposite! Who defines these terms? Who defines what is canonical?
127.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I assume this is a reply to my comment. What you're saying here is right, but I have no idea why you're saying it as I really don't care about being special, at all. Never crossed my mind until now, and nobody ever told me so
128.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Why would they not pay? Perhaps they don't care about the .8 USD they'll lose the opportunity to gain?
129.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
> This is what I will never understand about most established tech people, they see all the widespread misery and poverty in SV and they still have the capacity to feel sorry for themselves for not making X times more than 'that oth
130.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
There's no well-known millionaire founder behind Signal
131.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
(capital) (asset), not (capital asset) I'm not well versed on English/US accounting terms, this was not intended. Where I live, I pay a "capital gains tax" on my "assets" - including Bitcoin.
132.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I wouldn't call it easy - they might be able to see what is publicly shared, but shouldn't have any non-public access to the other computers/devices. But most of all, they wouldn't dare. Mistakes and individual excesses
133.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Yeah, especially if it's not absolutely necessary (e.g. the goal would be otherwise impossible). I'd be okay if they regulated telco carriers a little bit more than they already do; much more okay than with anything resembling wha
134.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I can't decide if your comment is intentional misinformation or just plain clueless. Bitcoin is obviously capital asset. People pulling out of a capital asset in order to consume doesn't underline anything, just as pulling out of
135.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Lol, don't speak about high taxes if you don't even know how Norway and oil go together...
136.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Is this a defense company now, then? https://twitter.com/walter_report/status/1523497545351278593... Any company doing shipping for the military has large government contracts. The government contracts have turnov
137.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Is a trucking company a defense company if they ship something for the military? Or the same with air transport?
138.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Why is SMS auth (like my bank does, with plain HTML/CSS pages) not sufficient? Anyways, my government is sending me SMS for auth anyways and won't stop anytime soon. No need to introduce yet another requirement on the citizens.
139.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
That's one of the big problems of states. Every power you give a state government, there's someone (not one - thousands, if not more) waiting to do bad things with it. And while they're busy with it, the other part will keep
140.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Never say a negative thing to your subordinate, especially not about something they spent a lot of time on. It's always possible to frame a sensible point constructively.
141.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
That doesn't change anything about it being bullshit. Web is still there and better than ever, and works on every platform too (as it always did). For their purposes, it's feasible to render only the most basic HTML/CSS and p
142.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
But that's a complete lie. There is the web, which has worked more than well enough for all government-personal contact purposes way before Android and iOS even existed. It's only now that they stopped caring about web and do the
143.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Your whole argument breaks down when it is me - a "completely unqualified", uneducated person, but also a programmer since I was 6 y/o - who has to teach people with university diplomas how to do it correctly. Happens at ever
144.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I never visualize the keyboard even though I could, it's all muscle memory.
145.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Well then you've never seen poor people uninstalling apps from their cheap smartphones because they need to install and use a different one ;-) that you don't see it doesn't mean it's not there
146.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I'd love to make a good browser game and I know how, but I am absolutely useless wrt. game design stuff itself.
147.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
The battle is fought over performance and size, I think that's exactly what the user wants.
148.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
I wish I could down vote links.
149.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
Video unavailable due to copyright...
150.
▲
by
emteycz
4y ago
See WebVM
More ›