Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
elktown
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
211.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
I think an underestimated issue with k8s (et al) is on a cultural level. Once you let in complex generic things, it doesn't stop there. A chain reaction has started, and before you know it, you've got all kinds of components reinf
212.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
The problem is that our field has a deep seated problem with differentiating good engineering with over-engineering. The latter is taken as the former. In my experience SREs/devops will just as often over-engineer and leak their abstra
213.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
The quality of your comments is so poor it's on a caricature level. > basic rights such as 10 weeks of paid parental leave
214.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> I'm sure it is very nice to have extra vacation. Parental leave is not vacation.
215.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Probably not worth spending energy on people that are on the revisionism level of "The Nazis were socialists" anyway, they've clearly decided to shut the door on reality.
216.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
If so, you need to adjust your critical thinking skills. Deeply unnuanced posts about highly debated topics - like the one you replied to - should set off alarm bells. Unless you think that a random HN user (with a very dodgy comment histor
217.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
I picked the line within a context, explained the context multiple times to you to make sure. You picked the line, removed all context of the discussion and the goes on to compare it a randomly picked textbook intro line. Simply mindbogglin
218.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> as I showed earlier you mean by picking the intro one-liner from a textbook? haha, pathetic. whatever floats your boat mate.
219.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> Given that at no point did I point to our "brilliance", I assumed you refererring to my pointing to tacit knowledge I deduced it from your general tone. But you're probably right that the tacit was part of it. > Have
220.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> I believe you may just not know what tacit knowledge is Not sure where you got that from, haven't said anything about it nor did I include that in my quotes. I'm well aware of it. But if I have one comment on it would be that
221.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Answered somewhat what I mean by at least the "code smells" and idiosyncrasies (competency was probably too harsh with given the amount of info) in a reply to another user. > Your arrogance precludes a fruitful discussion. This
222.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Let's just say that that sphere of the software dev community isn't exactly universally seen as competent work, more like the orthodoxy of ~15 years ago that's now increasingly, and in my opinion rightfully, being put into qu
223.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> into ad hominem and straw man attacks. That’s one of the worst part about this industry: people’s inability to debate and discuss Let's see here: > You have experienced what happens when web developers cosplay as software archi
224.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Someone got to say it so I will. Most of your comments comes across like you've gone off the rails and started replacing competency, not to mention humility, with narcissism. Being so cocksure and backing it up with statements that you
225.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> No, not at all. The only thing I did was to react on how ridiculous that oversimplification is and how such a thing can only come about due to an embarrassing amount of hubris currently going around our field with relation to "AI&
226.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Haha, still honing in on the specific comment, you're beyond help. Like bitcoin cultists from 10 years ago.
227.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> There is nothing in Visarga's comment that indicates hubris I think it does, and I've explained exactly how but you just pivots to snarky comments on specific words instead - first scientists, then magic, then oversimplified.
228.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Yet again you just pick out a word, "oversimplified" in this case, ignores the rest of the reply - and more importantly, the entire context of all these replies - and goes on to make a nonsensical comparison with the ever-present
229.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
No, not at all. The only thing I did was to react on how ridiculous that oversimplification is and how such a thing can only come about due to an embarrassing amount of hubris currently going around our field with relation to "AI"
230.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Even with added quotes you can't stop reading it literally? The total lack of critical thinking due to confirmation bias is just as embarrassing.
231.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
The entire point was that we do not understand it? That much of how the brain work is "magic" atm. It's our field that are the alchemist mystics, rambling about AGI/Philosopher's Stone in ever increasingly unhinge
232.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> There is no magic in the brain. The amount of hubris we have in our field is deeply embarrassing. Imagine a neuroscientists reading that. The thought makes me blush.
233.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Over the years, it's become abundantly clear that solidarity is very foreign concept to HN.
234.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Do you think it's nature or nurture that responsible for a Dwight Schrute personality?
235.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Pathetically dishonest pivot.
236.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
90% of people in my country means that obviously not all are rich.
237.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
Not everyone is a arrogant cheapskate like yourself. The actual reason is that it's 99% of the time correct due to it generally being a well-functioning system proven over time.
238.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
> So what did it save me over the way US taxes are done? The form prefilled the numbers, that’s it. All the rest is the same. Same collecting forms, same doubling checking math. I'd wager that ~90% of people where I'm from wher
239.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
and it was bought by Facebook, it didn't sell itself to the superficiality of Wall Street. Do you think it would've able to get there with 55 employees? I do not. Do you have an example of that?
240.
▲
by
elktown
3y ago
The real problem is that too many people has a preconceived notion that profit-driven corporations are economically rational. No, incentives to grow in size are everywhere from individual middle-manager careerism all the way to boost-number
More ›