4 ms·
Haha, still honing in on the specific comment, you're beyond help. Like bitcoin cultists from 10 years ago.
by elktown 3y ago
Haha, still honing in on the specific comment, you're beyond help. Like bitcoin cultists from 10 years ago.
- lern_too_spel 3y agoWhy did you criticize the comment if you don't think it deserves criticism? Words have meaning.
- elktown 3y ago> No, not at all. The only thing I did was to react on how ridiculous that oversimplification is and how such a thing can only come about due to an embarrassing amount of hubris currently going around our field with relation to "AI". It's a hand-wavy "Eh, how hard can it be?" comment to rationalize ML being a pathway to AGI. Added emphasis, and others reacted the same way. You can disagree with the interpretation but to like disallow it like you seem to be attempting is really weird.
- lern_too_spel 3y agoVisarga's comment is equivalent to comments that neuroscientists make, as I showed earlier, so inferring that it means, "How hard can it be?" is your mistake alone, not visarga's. The voters agree.
- elktown 3y ago> as I showed earlier you mean by picking the intro one-liner from a textbook? haha, pathetic. whatever floats your boat mate.
- lern_too_spel 3y agoYou picked an intro one-liner from visarga's comment. It's amazing that you really can't see that this is the same thing and yet are capable of using the Internet. Neither one claims to know how the brain does what it does, but they both say that the brain does the same thing.
- elktown 3y agoI picked the line within a context, explained the context multiple times to you to make sure. You picked the line, removed all context of the discussion and the goes on to compare it a randomly picked textbook intro line. Simply mindbogglingly stupid.
- lern_too_spel 3y agoNot randomly picked. The introduction. Visarga's comment is not a treatise on how exactly to reproduce the brain. The fact that you still don't understand this is seriously impressive.