Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eganist
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
241.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> After that, focus should then shift to dealing with the obsolete worker population in the maximally economical way. Tax companies at 2x the single-taxpayer withholding amount lost per employee displaced. So if an employee normally mak
242.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
To be clear, I'm looking for references to criminal law, not civil or case law. This all seems a combination of the latter, and even here it's not obvious what applies in cases where a third party produces the infringing content.
243.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Are there even any criminal laws against this? I mean, it strikes me that there should be, but my non lawyerly self has never heard of any.
244.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> What do you mean by forced? What happens if you don't log in? What happens if you try to log in in firefox? Companies with application allow-lists simply don't allow non-Chrome browsers for use on their endpoints. That's
245.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> Revenue gained from [copyright] law - minus sum of [all fees], [royalties], [license overhead], [additional red tape someone has to jump through to use information] - minus sum of the same for all government agencies that one pays tax
246.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Can you help me understand how "[copyright] law is actually a huge tax on doing knowledge work for everyone except the 1%?"
247.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Got it, so you have a general aversion to copyright, the concept of intellectual property, and to an extent, the funding of knowledge work I'm assuming? You didn't carve out any exceptions, hence my assumption.
248.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
What are "(c)opywrong" laws? I'm not being facetious. What specifically are you drawing objection to?
249.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Do you tokenize that data so that it stays consistent through all the flows? Fits the same parameters etc?
250.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Unrelated to this but responding to your other question that was deleted but still valuable: > What do you mean by "live, regulated data into non-prod environments" exactly? Could you provide some examples? Credit card numbers
251.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> A proliferation of extremely high-quality fakes will educate the public about detecting fakes, and spark an increase in the value of the real. If the last three years have taught us anything, it's that ~40% of people have no inter
252.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Neat concept. In regulated environments, how would you propose implementing this to minimize the spread of live, regulated data into non-prod environments? think full PANs (PCI) etc. I don't know that there's necessarily a wrong a
253.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> Sometimes Copilot will be right, other times usefully wrong — but it will always put you further ahead. If there's one tangentially related development I'm actually interested to see how it fleshes out in broader work discu
254.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> wouldn't it have been just as bad (and perhaps worse??) if they had been public over the last couple years? Bad for who? The original investors would've gotten their exit at a superlative valuation, and with any eventual down
255.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
SLLaMa?
256.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Can't share datapoints from where I work, but competitive datapoints I've gotten vary from 300k total comp to 800k total comp for senior, staff, principal engineers as well as managers in SF, LA, and DC (though DC is on the lower
257.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
to their credit, I actually did mean XR (extended reality), but alas. VR/AR are fine. MR sounds weird in context even though it's broader (mixed reality).
258.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Thanks, totally forgot
259.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Speculating: this is why I expect the heavy computing will probably be offloaded to an iPhone via a new wireless protocol, possibly one that's specifically certified for it (an "iPhone AR^?") with beefier specs and a better b
260.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> what financial advantage is he meant to have then gained by encouraging others to do the same? Assuming the FDIC doesn't make everyone whole, then all of his portfolio companies using SVB will see themselves with valuations lessen
261.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
For all practical purposes, the moment of withdrawal. Though the FRB states that "maturity" is not something that applies to these types of accounts. https://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/supmanual/cch
262.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> VCs have fiduciary responsibility to their Limited Partners. > VCs must act in the best financial interest of their LPs. So if a VC knew or suspected that their investments were at risk due to bank insolvency, they have a fiduciary
263.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Your recitals are correct, yes. But this: > the bank was insolvent long before that. Well, not quite. Insolvency was achieved the moment of the bank run. Until then, the bank was fully solvent based on the value of its liquid assets, inc
264.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> It's not VCs or SMB owners obligation to keep propping up failing banks. Thiel here did his job properly by advising his companies to take care of their own fate. He might've done his short term job properly, but there'
265.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
The bank became* insolvent as a consequence of the actions taken by a select few to encourage withdrawals; the asset-liability mismatch wouldn't have been consequential had the run not been spurred on. I'm not giving a tutorial ab
266.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
I didn't. I was going off the comments and headline. Thanks for the call-out, it's well deserved.
267.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
Edit: I was going only off the headline, never opened the article. original comment below. --- Somewhat surprised we're not measuring in Angstroms yet. 18 and 20 angstroms respectively. Might not be a SI unit but it's still metric
268.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> A little snark in there about democratizing, as some people will always put a positive spin on such things Let's try this: "Instagram makes pandemic the mental illness that used to only affect child stars and the hollywood f
269.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
From what I recall, the donation prompt says "not now" to dismiss, in which case you're consenting to being reminded later by picking that option. If you wish to never see the prompt again, you would have to uninstall the app
270.
▲
by
eganist
4y ago
> Are you trying to normalise harassment? Harassment is defined as "aggressive pressure or intimidation." Can you help everyone here understand how occasional requests for donation for a free service you voluntarily use constit
More ›