edem

55 ms·

631.
by edem 9y ago
This year I ramped up my home projects. I always wanted to create my own game universe with simulated entities (just like in Dwarf Fortress) so my first step towards that is an ASCII/Tile engine, Zircon ( https://github.com&#
632.
by edem 9y ago
What is the problem with Tether? Do you refer to USDT?
633.
by edem 9y ago
This is just FUD. As others have stated I can cash out any time I want. I have USDT, localbitcoins.com and BTC ATMs at my disposal.
634.
by edem 9y ago
I know this is old but this is what got me started: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
635.
by edem 9y ago
It is not about stupidity, more like the blub paradox. If you only know C and Go you have no idea why for example Kotlin would be better for the majority of the cases because to see it you have to use it.
636.
by edem 9y ago
If you look for an oop or fp language you are also out of luck. You are only happy if you look for a better C which most people aren't.
637.
by edem 9y ago
I see no facts or genuine refutation in this article, just opinions. Therefore I can only assume that truth hurts because the article you are trying to argue with has a bunch of valid points. If you look at the history of Go you have to rea
638.
The cost of devaluing women(nytimes.com)
3 points by edem 9y ago|2 comments
639.
by edem 9y ago
Note to self: keep a snack bag on myself at all times...just in cage...
640.
by edem 9y ago
Why don't they learn to use standardized measurement units...
641.
by edem 9y ago
Why there isn't an on-line version?
642.
Cultivating Burning Desire(stevepavlina.com)
1 points by edem 9y ago|0 comments
643.
by edem 9y ago
I think it us the other way around. Scala code tends to become an untangleable mess over time while Kotlin stays simple since the language is simple.
644.
by edem 9y ago
I have the same feelings to Dwarf Fortress.
645.
by edem 9y ago
I think comments get diminishing returns. If you check the user profile it is still in positive.
646.
The most downvoted comment in Reddit's history(reddit.com)
237 points by edem 9y ago|198 comments
647.
The uncomfortable secret to creative success is disequilibrium(qz.com)
2 points by edem 9y ago|0 comments
648.
by edem 9y ago
No he was not right. You can write two-way interop and it is not hard. I have actually written a library which does it. He did not say that "the two-way interop is not seamless". He said that you "can't write two way
649.
by edem 9y ago
This does not mean that it is a one-way interop. When you write it the right way, it will work from Java.
650.
by edem 9y ago
Now that is true. You also can't use reified generics (which is a bit hacky anyway).
651.
by edem 9y ago
No no no no. Kotlin provides a lot of tools to make your library usable from Java and it works.
652.
by edem 9y ago
You are surprised because it is not true. I can prove that you can write two-way interop just check the library I've written and posted above.
653.
by edem 9y ago
This is definitely NOT TRUE . I've written a library which is used from both Java and Scala and it just works. Here: https://github.com/Hexworks/zircon Just because you didn't manage to get it work
654.
by edem 9y ago
Well only if you are a mathematician living in a box but this is the real world you know.
655.
by edem 9y ago
Yep, but it is a baroque abomination which I would rather steer clear of.
656.
by edem 9y ago
I write Kotlin for more than a year and semicolon usage is pretty consistent: no semicolons. The only place I remember using them is in enum constants. I also came from the lisp world (CL -> Clojure).
657.
Data Explorer: a hidden treasure chest for IT professionals(the-cogitator.com)
2 points by edem 9y ago|0 comments
658.
by edem 9y ago
PagerDuty is a crime against humanity.
659.
by edem 9y ago
I do! Do you think have robots? :D
660.
by edem 9y ago
I agree with the part that you should write tests, but I definitely disagree with the part that most of your tests should be integration tests. As you pointed out the testing pyramid suggests that you should write more unit tests. Why? Beca

More ›