dqv

47 ms·

511.
by dqv 5y ago
Ah. I thought that fast storage was a more specific type of storage that might be more expensive. I mean 1000tb is expensive, but it’s feasible to get to that scale with the right funding.
512.
by dqv 5y ago
>not sure what to call it Yaolhoo. Pronounced y’all who.
513.
by dqv 5y ago
Interesting. I did not know it was (mail) server side! I assumed that, like many PHP applications, those filters were just ran using a cron job that calls a PHP script periodically.
514.
by dqv 5y ago
That's true. I wouldn't mind paying a lawyer more to write less. I imagine the question of "why am I paying so much when you did so little" comes up a lot of the contract the lawyer produces isn't long.
515.
by dqv 5y ago
Not really. Gmail is still one of the best webmail experiences IMO, so you have to prefer clients like Thunderbird if you want to go the self-hosted route. Some people really like RoundCube, but I only use it when it’s absolutely necessary.
516.
by dqv 5y ago
What is fast storage? Is that, for right now, the fastest SSDs available?
517.
by dqv 5y ago
Hey! Thank you so much for MIAB. I've been using it for personal and business email since May of 2016. It has been an absolute joy to use and administer. I am truly grateful.
518.
by dqv 5y ago
Is there really a point to the long contracts other than billable hours? Upthread, I speculated on that being the reason why "contract ergonomics" is not widespread. A while ago on the Verizon website, I recall seeing a "plai
519.
by dqv 5y ago
I think the meeting of the minds happens at the point where it reaches what the customer should know. That is, the customer is not only agreeing to the T&C, they're agreeing that they should know what is contained in the T&C
520.
by dqv 5y ago
The issue is the spam still gets through on every single one of these providers, so that reputation isn’t nearly as important. Reliably receiving emails is. If that aspect of their reputation is damaged, it may never recover.
521.
by dqv 5y ago
>That seems to require a Microsoft account and that's something I neither have nor want. I believe sending emails has to work without having to register an account for each provider you're interacting with. Yes it does require
522.
by dqv 5y ago
For corporate support, that’s totally on them. Checking the spam folder is customer support. The “oh sorry your email went to spam!” is one of the few times I express dissatisfaction to a company. It’s not my responsibility to make sure m
523.
by dqv 5y ago
What kind of mail are you sending? Are you getting anything on your abuse@ address? Are you getting any feedback on JMRP [0]? If all else fails, the mailop mailing list [1] can get you closer to someone on one of these networks to help. &gt
524.
by dqv 5y ago
And my retort is “that you know of”. If mine isn’t getting to you, who else’s isn’t? (For businesspeople) how much business are you losing because Google isn’t letting mail through? It’s one thing if the server is declining email and tellin
525.
by dqv 5y ago
I've said elsewhere in the thread, but everyone has a circle of influence. Big Mail needs to maintain a reputation of being reliable. I can and have convinced people that e.g. Yahoo mail is not reliable for receiving mail and to stop
526.
by dqv 5y ago
I think DO is really good about policing their IP space. When I signed up for the Microsoft JMRP [0], DO was already a contact of record for the IP I was using. I just appended myself to the list to get any abuse reports as well. >Every
527.
by dqv 5y ago
It's obvious when your domain (well, the IP really) is blacklisted. You either get a nasty error from the mail system saying it didn't go through or that the server was unreachable or what have you. You're always going to get
528.
by dqv 5y ago
By the third time I was saying IT’S ENOUGH SLICES [0]. In all seriousness, it’s fine if that is the reset procedure, but I think they should provide some kind of reset socket tool where you can screw in the bulb and it will run the procedur
529.
by dqv 5y ago
>won’t prevent 99.999% of spam because nobody will set it up I would. And anyone who doesn't want the spam would. Right now we send "550 Too much spam" responses to docs and sharepoint emails. I'd be happy to, as an a
530.
by dqv 5y ago
I got pretty far in the beginning just by reading the docs on Phoenix channels [0]. I was learning Phoenix and ReactJS at the same time and got a pretty simple Redux thunk that interacted with Phoenix Channels in a few days. I'm not s
531.
by dqv 5y ago
No, I am not. The GP said that it is a popular method lately and I explained that it has been happening for years. What TFA is saying is that there will be more communication about files being blocked, but it doesn't suggest to me th
532.
by dqv 5y ago
Nah Google doesn’t care about that. Spammers have been doing it for years on Google Drive/Docs and Microsoft Sharepoint.
533.
by dqv 5y ago
It's easily noticed when omitted improperly and more easily overlooked when done correctly.
534.
by dqv 5y ago
We're operating in reality where the answer to "is this even a customer" is often "unsure - to be determined", not an imagined scenario where software with 100% accuracy tells us when someone isn't.
535.
by dqv 5y ago
It is very much about experience. Now that I’m an old man in my late 20’s I can tell when it’s BS, but I empathize with the fear of the less-experienced. The first time I had a personal legal experience, I was confident about what the law w
536.
by dqv 5y ago
That’s an FAQ for consumers. It’s not legally binding. >These FAQs provide general consumer information about the CCPA and how you can exercise your rights under the CCPA. They are not legal advice, regulatory guidance, or an opinion of
537.
by dqv 5y ago
Customers say weird shit in correspondence all the time and you have to fill in a lot of blanks. This would have easily imprinted “oh she lived in California at one point and wants to know if we’ll still comply with her requests” in custome
538.
by dqv 5y ago
No one said it is.
539.
by dqv 5y ago
The things I would look for in an illegitimate email are not there. Where are the typos? The poor use of language? It is a very well-crafted email. The address is maybe a little off, but tons of my legitimate clients have weird emails like
540.
by dqv 5y ago
They weren't just asking questions. From the email: >My questions are about your process for when I do submit a request. It's really easy to read this as "I am going to be submitting a request." >I look forward t

More ›