Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dpkonofa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
391.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
Applications do not need permission. The user that is currently controlling the application needs to be able to use that application to read and write files but there's no reason that the application needs access when it's not in
392.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
Because, in this particular case, the user was using software (Alfred 3) that he knew wasn't going to work right on Catalina prior to upgrading it. Newer versions of Alfred exist that support the newer permissions model in Catalina. He
393.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>for like 90% of people Citation needed. I would venture to say that more people use it than you think.
394.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
Yes, but that took nearly 2 years (1.5 if you're only counting from individual public sales) and the launch was terrible . I'm glad that Vista happened because it very much needed to but they really shit the bed on its release.
395.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
I don't understand why people feel this way. Apple's doing away with 3D Touch because of the data that says that people don't use it. What makes you think they wouldn't do the same with the Touch Bar? Despite that, I lov
396.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>You know, this is a pretty apt analogy. Disagree wholeheartedly. It definitely has "hints" of Vista band-aid rips in the same way that shit like La Croix has "hints" of flavor but Vista was one of the worst OS releas
397.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
You expect applications to have access to your desktop? You should only ever expect the user to have access to the desktop and, even then, the only apps that would ever prompt for access to the desktop are those that aren't updated for
398.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
I disagree but only for one major reason: the entire reason this is coming up is because the OP is using an old version of Alfred that wasn't prepped for the new permission settings of Catalina even though there's a fully compa
399.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>From Apple's historically more oppressive stance against freedom of expression in their own wallet garden, and the recent actions against the HK protest movement I would love to see how you justify Apple's actions as "his
400.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
That's the entire point. Even if Apple was going to be able to go somewhere else (India, US, etc.), it wouldn't hurt China much if every other tech company maintains course and/or doubles down on China. Unless China is hurt e
401.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
That's a huge straw man and not at all what I was referring to. Stop buying goods that support these policies. Stop supporting politicians that support these policies. Stop patronizing companies that lobby for these things. Use apps li
402.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
Of course but I think the point is that we can stop supporting the continued benefit of these. Money talks and both people and corporations can talk the talk by not supporting these countries and not caving to them.
403.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>less ethical option Are you getting that because of this flag issue or is there more behind that? I would argue that Apple is, by far, the more ethical option.
404.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>Enjoy having no support or economic progress from us - bye". This would have to be done on a federal level. Just because Apple stopped doing this doesn't mean China would be any worse off. Google, Amazon, and every other tech
405.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
I'm not a fan of his. Although I think he's super-smart and one of the few people I would actually trust to repair my devices on a component level, I really hate his click-bait videos when they're anti-Apple and/or pro-R
406.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
That is one way to fix it too, if you don't want to have to re-buy shielded cables.
407.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
This is specific to USB-C and unshielded cabling. It's the same issue that Louis Rossman tried to blame on the new MacBooks until his Dell laptop started doing the same thing with the adapter. Especially for powered USB devices, unshie
408.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
I disagree wholeheartedly but I am, admittedly, also an owner of a Tesla. The thing is that it's not like any other car from any other manufacturer and it's, by a good multitude of miles, the best car I've ever owned. There
409.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
That is nonsense. He butchered that phone and definitely, 100% ruined the waterproofing function of the phone. Additionally, I'm curious which manufacturers you're speaking of because, the last time this type of comment came aroun
410.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
This is exactly it. Even if a malicious extension gets through, they have access to nothing on the user side. It's not a fair trade off but, in my opinion, it is a worthwhile one.
411.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
This is a really long-standing battle between user accessibility and user freedom. Any time a software system or platform or OS allows for people to do whatever they want without restriction, you end up with thousands of compromised systems
412.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
They never suggested anything of the sort. That being said, for every uBO that doesn't send that data back home, there are 1000s of "ad-blockers" that do exactly that.
413.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
I think that's exactly what this means, friend. /me cackles loudly
414.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
Apple wasn't eager to protect the device of a terrorist. They were eager to protect everyone's devices. Opening up access to "the terrorist's" device would open up that access to every device. I, personally, thi
415.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>iCloud has been hacked how many times now? The platform itself has not been hacked, so I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. All the "hacks" against iCloud have been social engineering and/or user exploit
416.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
While I do admit that I agree with a few of those points, the Verge isn't exactly reporting in good-faith either, IMO. They are very biased against Apple, for whatever reason.
417.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>Somehow the repair market for cars doesn’t have this problem They absolutely do have this problem. There's a reason that there's a stereotype around the "shady" mechanic. That example is the perfect reason why thes
418.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
That's the problem, though. Everything is coming from vice.com and all the search results are flooded with those same links and blogs linking to those links. It's nearly impossible to find any relevant information now outside of s
419.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
>this nearly passive resistance to be effective My entire point is to be active about the resistance. Don't just stop using something. Tell others to stop using and say why. Cease any and all contact with that media channel. The o
420.
▲
by
dpkonofa
7y ago
Are you sure it's printed? It looks laser engraved in the same way that custom iPod messages are. Doesn't look like it can rub off to me.
More ›