3 ms·
I disagree but only for one major reason: the entire reason this is coming up is because the OP is using an old version of Alfred that wasn't prepped for the n
by dpkonofa 7y ago
I disagree but only for one major reason: the entire reason this is coming up is because the OP is using an old version of Alfred that wasn't prepped for the new permission settings of Catalina even though there's a fully compatible version that's been released since. The vast majority of users will never, ever get something this obnoxious so it's not a bad on-boarding experience as much as it's a side effect of running old software.
- gowld 7y agoSurely many users have at least one piece of software that is a bit old. This Mac notion of "if your software/hardware wasn't purchased this week, it's unsupported" is not a good look.
- ben509 7y agoI don't know the numbers, especially as companies have pushed hard to change upgrade habits. But unless they're forced by automatic upgrades, most people wait years to upgrade. Even if they are upgrading because they get new hardware, they run all those migration assistants and such to copy everything over.
- dpkonofa 7y agoI'm sure they do but, as in the case of Alfred, they're notified multiple times that there is a newer version and that their OS may not support all the features of the app and vice versa. You have to explicitly ignore the dialog boxes and install the new OS anyways to get the behavior being demonstrated in the OP.