dontmobile

5 ms·

1.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Agreed. Though the 20 story apartment building is something I don't see happening tbh. The momentum is definitely here but I don't see it reaching that ideal. As with the highspeed rail it will likely hit some sort of deadlock com
2.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Deregulation has been getting introduced. ADUs have been approved and you can now do something called SB9 which if deployed to the maximum extent allows you to take a single property split it into two parcels and build two duplexes on each
3.
by dontmobile 3y ago
he's asking for advice here, it's not the CV he presents to jobs. The json thing is a little excessive but again not a "problem"
4.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Communication is the least of his problems. I read his post just fine. It's definitely not the most well written and clear post but it is far away from anything that I would call a "problem". He can definitely shorten his cv,
5.
by dontmobile 3y ago
There's a difference between magic performed for others and magic performed for yourself. When you perform magic for other people it should be on par with if not better than what they've seen before. When you perform for yourself.
6.
by dontmobile 3y ago
There's a difference between wild speculation and reasonable speculation with high likelihood. For example. I speculate you are a male and it's highly likely I'm right. The speculation I'm doing here is of the same natur
7.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Speed is not a measure of creativity but it is a critical factor in the generation of evidence. In that respect it is beating your argument on all counts. You don't have to provide anything. But it makes your argument weaker if you can
8.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Yeah why not challenge you? I assume your average. That's not wierd at all. If you wouldn't write something as bad as the poem then write something better. LLMs are taking away from artists simply because in the eyes of consumers
9.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Nobody said if it can't be measured it doesn't exist. Nothing of this nature was said or implied. What I do believe is that if it can't measured then it's existence is only worthwhile and relevant to you. It is not worth
10.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Not being combative. You are mistaken. I am simply trying to keep the conversation on point and prevent deviation. You made initial points I want those points to be determined to be definitively wrong or right before moving on and branching
11.
by dontmobile 3y ago
We are. But the point is you can't tell. You are entirely relying on my output to make an identification.
12.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Then write a better poem. Draw a better picture. I wouldn't say this example surpasses all humans. It surpasses most humans and matches those trained in poetry and in illustration. Where it does definitively excel is timing. Both the p
13.
by dontmobile 3y ago
A composition of a poem from this prompt is creative. The poem and the picture had to fill in elements not included in my prompt.
14.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Bad poem. But creative. It took some creative liberties which you did not like. Also the LLM took creative liberties on the picture, similar to a human. I guess if a human drew extra people in some mock up I would automatically assume that
15.
by dontmobile 3y ago
You asked for examples where it could do better than you and you stated it couldn't be creative. I gave you an example both in text form and in picture form where it is creative and it does better than you. First this proves it can do
16.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Am I? How do you know this isn't output generated by an LLM?
17.
by dontmobile 3y ago
No you can't break it down. The experts don't fully understand the high level implications of an LLM. This is definitive. We have no theoretical modelling of what LLMs will output. We can't predict it at all, therefore we do
18.
by dontmobile 3y ago
The only thing absurd is your argument. Short of mind reading inputs and outputs are the only thing we have to determine what is intelligent. Go ahead prove to me you are an intelligent being without emitting any output and I'll 100 pe
19.
by dontmobile 3y ago
Except this was never said. What was said is that intelligent output from an LLM implies a "possibility" (keyword) of intelligence. After all, outputs and inputs are all that we use to assume you as a human are intelligent. As of
20.
by dontmobile 3y ago
> stating that nobody knows what goes on inside obviously does not add to that. No one is saying that LLMs absolutely understand the world. But many people are saying that an aspect of understanding is a possibility likely enough to warr
21.
by dontmobile 3y ago
>"Intelligence" is begging the question when the whole debate is about whether they are intelligent, and what intelligence even is. Intelligent as in the output response is often indistinguishable from human level reasoning and
22.
by dontmobile 3y ago
The analogy is about abstraction. It is not about emergent properties. A computer program is characterized differently when it's a 3D engine versus a a series of instructions. Same with LLMs. We can characterize an LLM as a text predic
23.
by dontmobile 3y ago
There are limitations with LLMs but nobody is being clear about it. The overall state of LLMs can be distilled into 3 points: 1. LLMs Can produce output that is equal in intelligence and creativity to humans. It can even produce output that
24.
by dontmobile 3y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis Replication is just a nice term for it. It can just as well be a crisis of fraud with the failure of replicating fraudulent results as the consequence. Scientific fraud