dont_dox_me_bro

3 ms·

1.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
I mean I think it's very telling since there was an acquisition nearly 6 months later by his previous company. That's quite an incestuous relationship, but hey he got his payday after removing two core contributors that were emplo
2.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
Selective reading strikes me once again.
3.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
The user in question can't actually access his profile or his repos. He's not shadbowbanned, he is actually banned.
4.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
I mean if the end result is that no one can access the repos how is that not basically deleting them? Are we just arguing semantics because the end result is the same?
5.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
Sad to see that the "ban first, make human contact extremely hard" has now affected GitHub. Hopefully they reverse it, but definitely a sad to see the "open source community" website go this path.
6.
GitHub bans Neovim plugin creator and deletes repos(old.reddit.com)
19 points by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago|12 comments
7.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
Well you see, because other people can break the law apparently means you're allowed to break it too.
8.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
I really wonder what he means by low expectations as a billionaire? I'm guessing it's drastically different than the 70 year olds I know working retail jobs so they don't die from poverty.
9.
by dont_dox_me_bro 3y ago
Do you think he would feel the same if the government split apart Nvidia and forced them to either sell the software (CUDA) or hardware as separate companies? After all, it's not like he has the right to run his company at the detrimen