Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dogecoinbase
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Other people here and elsewhere have demonstrated direct code copying. It's not hard to find. The license/copyright notice (and note that the copyright notice with the names of individuals easily invalidates your assertion regard
92.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
> However in the real world people don't always write bugless code and aren't always alert when driving. Therefore these AI assistants can still have a net positive result as long as they are better than the average performance
93.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
It's happily spitting out licenses and copyright notices with other people's names on them, it's pretty clearly half-baked.
94.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
_You_ are not in control of _your_ devices. Your television will use this technology to report what shows you're watching to the company that manufactured it; the web browser running on your computer will use this technology to report
95.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Signal didn't publish the source for their server-side from 20 April 2020 to 6 April 2021 while they secretly added a cryptocurrency payment system. Open source is only open if the source is available (and yes -- if their end-to-end e
96.
▲
Reverse Engineering the M6 Smart Fitness Bracelet
(rbaron.net)
94 points
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
|
7 comments
97.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Thanks for your input! You have committed a subvariety of the classic tu quoque logical fallacy also sometimes colloquially known as "whataboutism". It is irrelevant to the topic at hand. Would you care to try again, and addres
98.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Obviously not, rather because of the significant negative externalities that remain unaddressed after over a decade.
99.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
I would highly recommend Paul Benacerraf's article "What Numbers Could Not Be" for a philosophical if somewhat technical take on the subject (PDF link): http://michaeljohnsonphilosophy.com/wp-content/uplo
100.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
I recognize the ways in which this is a difficult problem, but it remains frustrating to me that the application isn't capable of providing this information directly to end users. Instead you end up with confusion, missed communicatio
101.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
If you're curious about the Handshake project, this is basically all I needed to hear: they based their domain-claiming system on DNSSEC -- and when they launched they couldn't even claim their _own domain_ because .org was still
102.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Advertisers.
103.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
This reminds me of an all-time favorite essay: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2756 "We can ask: if consciousness is reducible to computation, then what kinds of computation suffice to bring about consciousn
104.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
I've never been able to get over Handshake basing their domain-claiming system on DNSSEC -- and when they launched they couldn't even claim their _own domain_ because .org was still signed with a RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 key: https:&#x
105.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Ah yes, Kraken: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-court-authorizes-irs-see... I would suggest that engineers looking to make huge amounts of money think carefully about potential liability and whether they'
106.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
is this a criticism of the linked site, or HN? ... and to stay on topic, .org may not be credible, but the indistinguishable-at-a-glace .ong is absolutely vetted. So keep an eye our for that ;)
107.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Note that this was _not_ originally the case -- Jason Fried edited his post after the fact without noting it: https://twitter.com/waxpancake/status/1386810666221150210
108.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Here's a link to the CR report with details of their testing: https://www.consumerreports.org/autonomous-driving/cr-engine...
109.
▲
Consumer Reports engineers find Teslas can drive with nobody in the driver seat
(cnbc.com)
5 points
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
|
1 comments
110.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
I noted this in another comment, but if they _did not_ update the code in production, they ran with known vulnerabilities in the server side for many months: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server/commit/3
111.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
In this case, they not only didn't update with changes, but didn't address specific concerns about known vulnerabilities in their outdated repo: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server/commit/3432
112.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Previous discussion of the addition of payments here on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26713827 In addition to the conflict of interest Moxie has (and, honestly, I can see that side -- of course he'd want to
113.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
5y ago
Finally, I can purchase something without recourse in the event that I'm defrauded.
114.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
One of my favorites is in POSIX date format strings: %p locale's equivalent of either AM or PM %P like %p, but lower case
115.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
If the code is the contract, each of those actors is individually liable as a tortfeasor.
116.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
Please re-read my comment four posts upthread. It's possible that this code wasn't in production; if so, there were known vulnerabilities left open for months.
117.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
At the time of that fork, the Ethereum website literally said "the code is the contract". Then, when someone found a perfectly legitimate use of that code that the creators failed to anticipate, they forcibly altered the contract
118.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
All of the code was released today. Up until earlier today, the most recent public commit on the repo was https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server/commit/3432529f9c... , the commit immediately prior to the
119.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
If this code was _not_ in production, they had known vulnerabilites: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server/commit/3432529f9c... There is no interpretation of these events that's a good look, especia
120.
▲
by
dogecoinbase
6y ago
Fantastic, thank you for the response (I also found out where Luke was headed and it seems like a much more positive development overall)! Looking forward to the announcement with additional detail.
More ›