3 ms·
Obviously not, rather because of the significant negative externalities that remain unaddressed after over a decade.
by dogecoinbase 5y ago
Obviously not, rather because of the significant negative externalities that remain unaddressed after over a decade.
- marsrover 5y agoIf we want to address significant negative externalities that have remain unaddressed for over a decade maybe we should look into how many people we bomb on a frequent basis. Or healthcare. Or corruption in politics. Or our crumbling society.
- nielsbot 5y agoyes, those are also bad
- marsrover 5y agoThanks your your valuable input.
- oriki 5y ago"Bad thing exists, therefore, really, this isn't that bad of a thing" isn't an argument.
- marsrover 5y agoIt is when it's a zero sum game.
- dogecoinbase 5y agoThanks for your input! You have committed a subvariety of the classic tu quoque logical fallacy also sometimes colloquially known as "whataboutism". It is irrelevant to the topic at hand. Would you care to try again, and address the argument rather than deflecting?
- marsrover 5y agoGiven finite resources we can only pursue finite actions. Pretending decisions are made in a vacuum is naive. Let me know when you learn about your next word of the week.