doc_ick

7 ms·

151.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
That truly is sad, as execution and even distribution is just now a prompt with a credit card.
152.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
100%
153.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
Likely not using / managing context windows properly and then having it re-read data it’s already gone through
154.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
I was about to say as well, I don’t think I’d be interested in ever using this project but now I definitely never will. I wonder if they are vibe coding this for humans but have disdain for humans, why make it for humans?
155.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
Your idea is my source code.
156.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
Going down that trail, eventually ai will eventually learn how to manage merge conflicts better (or whatever new scam). Or it could simply rewrite its own fork and support it all without user direction or supporting the core effort. All pot
157.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
Very true.
158.
by doc_ick 2mo ago
I disagree. As if a tool is customized via agents and something goes wrong, it should be the users issue to fix it. Say I want to customize a bank app (or sca tool) to use a nickname instead of my name, if it breaks then who fixes it?
159.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
What about the blue line indicates that? The blue line did not indicate anything to me as there’s no flow.
160.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Except in this case for this app you’re simply complaining that your app is rejected on “being ai”. I am also on team Apple, as I have no idea what this app actually does.
161.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
I mean, if you don’t think about it that’s true.
162.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
In the ai-article op did say they’d do exactly that. Though it is surprising they left GitHub due to ““enshittification” of the platform under Microsoft’s ownership”, when it’s likely GitHub is using similar ai practices the op is and match
163.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
I doubt it.
164.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Anecdotal
165.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Ah, thank you!
166.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Do you have a source link for the >5000 companies?
167.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Source?
168.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
So you’re saying there’s no data to group these settings by editions.
169.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Ditto with this, if arxiv is just a hosting site then what’s different then a personal GitHub site hosting your paper? Ai and Google would pick it up eventually.
170.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
I’d say these are reasonable settings for most uses. Though do you know of surveys that back this up? I don’t mean to nit pick too much, I’d just like to see common uses and the data.
171.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Hmm, I am surprised to hear it’s understood to be exponential, but thanks for the reference. I will read up on it.
172.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
“And here we found the culprit. The paper I was submitting belongs under cs.CY, Computers and Society, as I now know after reviewing all the categories more carefully.” I’d think the indirect cause is ai, given its recent bull/glass sh
173.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
With the rise of ai, ai-based papers, and ais writing terrible papers; why are you surprised or frustrated? Wouldn’t you want some kind of barrier against slop?
174.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
100%
175.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Thanks for trying to de-slop an ai-created project.
176.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Archived from 2018, it’d be more relevant to bring up a recipe about Oreo pie.
177.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Or you could log in here, or write newspapers about it, or make a nice Oreo pie and make sure everyone knows where every flock of materials is
178.
by doc_ick 3mo ago
Agreed, you need to have a clear mind and not too large of a sum to focus on work; for example making an Oreo pie.
179.
by doc_ick 4mo ago
I’m not quite sure you can read. The two points with getrandom directly tie into the points made, and the cwe points to the larger vuln. Speaking of which, you are consistently distracting away from the question of, what do you think is a p
180.
by doc_ick 4mo ago
Random strings aren’t truly random, can be predicted, and don’t carry information that can be used elsewhere

More ›