djrj477dhsnv

6 ms·

1.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
I wish this as well. I make a userdebug build myself to get adb root, which isn't difficult, but would be a lot nicer if it were officially supported.
2.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
TikTok and Instagram seem to be doing just fine..
3.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
For the last 6 months or so, Grok had been the most consistent for me, especially for anything that relies heavily on search.
4.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
If there is sexual activity involving a minor, yes, the parents should be able to pursue criminal and civil cases. Solicitation without any actions doesn't seem that important.
5.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Well that's an inherent problem of having multiple people with custody of a single child. Ideally a compromise can be reached, but in extreme cases I suppose it could end up with litigation. But still, this is a private dispute, not s
6.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
I don't agree that anything can be objectively harmful. I personally agree that it is harmful for minors up to some age. So again I would maintain it's the parents' responsibility to protect them until they reach that age.
7.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Doing dumb stuff and experimenting as a teenager is part of growing up. I don't see anything wrong with that.
8.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
> Does this logic extend to other things society has deemed vices? Yes. When a child is too young, parents should be directly preventing access to those vices. As their children get older, parents should have instilled enough values in
9.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Its subjectivity is a fact, so no research required.
10.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
If there are good reasons to restrict them, I'd expect them to deal with it. I never had access to cable television or video games growing up, while nearly all my classmates did. It wasn't a big deal.
11.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
It's pretty trivial to block access to certain sites or apps. Or better yet, you raise your kids well so that you don't need to rely on technology to keep them away from bad things.
12.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Stealing from anyone is already illegal, so that's not relevant here. And I don't think kids seeing porn is particularly harmful.
13.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Yes. What scenario did you have in mind?
14.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
What? I'm saying the government shouldn't be involved in bans at all. It should be up to the individual or their legal guardians.
15.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
I'd much rather be able to simply rsync the data folder for all apps on my phone without having the hardware KeyStore breaking backups installed on another device.
16.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Harm is subjective and I'd much rather parents make that call than the government. And there absolutely isn't consensus on when it's harmful to give children alcohol. Many would say it's good to give a child a glass of
17.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
The responsibility to protect children should be put on their parents. If they want to give their children devices to use unsupervised, then they should block access to whatever they deem harmful.
18.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Checkpoints, no. Searches with a warrant, yes.
19.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Only if they happen to know the connection between you and the seller's wallet addresses and your respective identities. Almost all the crypto I have is from p2p or freelancing. Very few could connect my identity and my wallets.
20.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Yes, I think everyone should be able to exchange payments freely. Drugs should be legal, so that's not a problem. Terrorism and human trafficking are more complicated topics, but basically I think they should be attacked more directly
21.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
The alternative is the freedom to make any financial transaction without the government being involved. If your concern is effective taxation, there are plenty of methods that worked historically while preserving financial privacy like prop
22.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Good. AML/KYC laws are a huge abuse of state power.
23.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
I disagree. I'd wager that state of the art LLMs can beat out of the average doctor at diagnosis given a detailed list of symptoms, especially for conditions the doctor doesn't see on a regular basis.
24.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
The boundaries between groups may be blurred, but surely a person whose ancestors lived in location A for the last 10 thousand years will be genetically more similar om average to other people from that location than to people in location B
25.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Aren't there already large long-living animals like elephants that basically don't get cancer?
26.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
For the issue of people not wearing seat belts causing insurance premiums to rise for all, a solution is for insurance companies to be allowed to refuse compensation in cases where seat belts weren't properly used. And yes, if those pe
27.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
That's like saying God is the best explanation for any newly described natural phenomenon.
28.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
Sure there are. An easy example is Australian aboriginals. They were geographically isolated for tens of thousands of years. Their subgroups are more related to each other than to other subgroups.
29.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
In quite a few Asian countries there are no banks left that don't force you to use their apps. There is not other option.
30.
by djrj477dhsnv 1y ago
You just have a flawed definition of success. By allowing people to shoot themselves in the foot after ignoring a unmistakable warning, you are helping teach the foolish to be more careful in the future. Making mistakes is the best way to l

More ›