djbebs

23 ms·

301.
by djbebs 5y ago
Do you truly believe that? The vast majority of Americans own their own home...
302.
by djbebs 5y ago
And then they complain that they are poor, that they can't buy a house, that the evil rich people TM are are keeping them down. Ultimately it's all about personal responsibility, and the incentives being create to make the lack of
303.
by djbebs 5y ago
Landlord are already incentivised to do so, the reason they don't is because there are costs of doing it, which regulation magnifies
304.
by djbebs 5y ago
Havr you considered the possibility that these laws don't protect anyone?
305.
by djbebs 5y ago
Then why the complaints about high housing prices? You cant pick and chose what to be outraged about when its those very policies causing the problem
306.
by djbebs 5y ago
Why would the incentibe to build be high?
307.
by djbebs 5y ago
Did you miss the banning of RT and sputnik?
308.
by djbebs 5y ago
If you dont want public hospitaps to treat certain things, you're welcome to advocate against public healthcare. Public healthcare is not a justification for slavery.
309.
by djbebs 5y ago
If you have a realistic understanding you know that all those hours of video are being kept essentially forever, and that current ai capabilities are more than good enough to keep an eye on your every move using that data. Whether you want
310.
by djbebs 5y ago
Or simply a realistic understanding of current technology and standard operating procedures of any competent surveillance agency
311.
by djbebs 5y ago
It really isn't, and the fact that this is the first time it has happened shows that its not.
312.
by djbebs 5y ago
I can receive information.
313.
by djbebs 5y ago
Bingo
314.
by djbebs 5y ago
It's not price gouging if the market is uncompetitive and there is a supply shock, because there's no such thing as price gouging.
315.
by djbebs 5y ago
Every censor was also doing something legal. It doesn't make their censorship any more rightful.
316.
by djbebs 5y ago
Dowsing doesn't work though...
317.
by djbebs 5y ago
Is it me or is this article pure rage bait? Constant mentions of race, no attempt to even discuss the reason why the state requested that, or the mechanism through which that would even be accomplished... It just feels like the sole purpose
318.
by djbebs 5y ago
The ones that have consistently been proven right about government overreach?
319.
by djbebs 5y ago
I'm in Germany, neither of those work for me.
320.
by djbebs 5y ago
No such distinction is necessary. I have a human right to be informed, even when that information is false. Censorship doesn't just violates RTs rights to inform, but also violates my right to be informed.
321.
by djbebs 5y ago
They already do, it's called taxes...
322.
by djbebs 5y ago
In Germany too
323.
by djbebs 5y ago
You're not old fashioned, you're just pro-censorship.
324.
by djbebs 5y ago
The opposite is happening in the EU, where people are committing a crime if they hold the russian stance.
325.
by djbebs 5y ago
The lowest paid already pay effectively no taxes and your suggestion is to have them pay less? Do you understand the incentives you're creating when you have only a small minority of productive people subsidize everyone else?
326.
by djbebs 5y ago
You mean it's theft. You're depriving people of use of their property without compensation.
327.
by djbebs 5y ago
Good to know namecheap isn't a reliable business partner. Will be moving over my stuff, and adding it to the blacklist
328.
by djbebs 5y ago
This is against the portuguese constitution btw. The EU has no right to do this.
329.
by djbebs 5y ago
Absolutely not. Citizenship isn't a piece of candy to give out or take away. Under no circumstances can or should it be removed. Even being able to give it up of ones own initiative is a morally repugnant, if necessary, compromise.
330.
by djbebs 5y ago
Lack of censorship is not a failure.

More ›