ditojim

13 ms·

121.
by ditojim 15y ago
i use my real name a lot of places on the internet, and i would prefer to "sign in with G+" rather than use facebook (where I use my real name, like most of you..)
122.
by ditojim 15y ago
does this improve a user's experience on a web app or a website? this won't last. users won't stand for it. i would stop using a website or web app if i had to do this every time i access it. other than that, it is a great idea. perhaps
123.
by ditojim 15y ago
especially when they block competition via court orders..
124.
by ditojim 15y ago
Apple is coming under increasing competition in the mobile phone market, specifically from Android. Despite the buckets of cash Apple has on hand, it is a fair assumption that Apple is increasingly focused on taking down Android by any mea
125.
by ditojim 15y ago
this is a fascinating story. it would be great to hear more about it.
126.
by ditojim 15y ago
Oh so your personal experience trumps Google's published uptime? Got it. My bad. I am a Google "advocate" but I state facts. My affiliations don't matter. Again, you are off base to suggest I disclose affiliations in comments on a news
127.
by ditojim 15y ago
please dont tell people to disclose things about themselves that are available in their profile, especially when the accuser provides no information whatsoever on their background. i think google apps is great. i sell it too. i'm not acti
128.
by ditojim 15y ago
So I can't state facts about a product I believe in, without disclosing my interests? I am not acting as a journalist, and I don't hide my affiliations. I disagree that I need to put a disclaimer on every comment I make. the information
129.
by ditojim 15y ago
what have you heard? google apps has been pretty solid for at least the last year.
130.
by ditojim 15y ago
google has been proving otherwise for the last few years.
131.
by ditojim 15y ago
just a friendly reminder that Google Apps had a 99.984% up-time last year.
132.
by ditojim 15y ago
"i'd +1 that" sounds better than "i'd like that".
133.
by ditojim 15y ago
What complexity do you refer to? Facebook has groups, it just has a crappy UX for it. Google's Circles are way better, easy, and kinda fun to setup with a slick UI. Once they are setup, it is easy to filter your content based on circles.
134.
by ditojim 15y ago
If google doesn't get social, who developed Google+? Too clean? I find the page very easy on the eyes and easy to use. Too private? I have put way more info in public (intentionally) on Google+ than Facebook. They make it easy. You are j
135.
by ditojim 15y ago
chromebooks now support VPN :) http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2390942,00.asp
136.
by ditojim 15y ago
This is a news article. It sounds like you are assuming news=facts. Microsoft employs FUD in the media. In this case, they are making specific use of the U in FUD. They are neither confirming or denying that they have ever shared such i
137.
by ditojim 15y ago
Read between the lines. Don't be naive.
138.
by ditojim 15y ago
The first sentence of the article also mentions that Microsoft has been forced to do the same thing.
139.
by ditojim 15y ago
we started our business in 2007 and have seemingly grown without issue despite tough times in our economy. it wasn't intentional that we started when the economy was going down, just a coincidence. it has worked out pretty well so far..
140.
by ditojim 15y ago
sounds like the investors already knew what we are starting to figure out; it isn't going to last.
141.
by ditojim 15y ago
thanks for brining clarity to this situation. why does microsoft consistently belittle the general public by making misleading statements? they are just dishonest people who bash others as a way of furthering their own products. i have gr
142.
by ditojim 15y ago
your translation reads similar to mine.
143.
by ditojim 15y ago
im not giving these websites anymore information about me, even if it is to "remove" me from their databases.
144.
by ditojim 15y ago
i'd love to have one of these in my building.
145.
by ditojim 15y ago
this is my argument: take care of your customers. contrary to your statement, it has gotten me somewhere since that is how i built my business. we've made mistakes and our partners have made mistakes, but we always put the customer's inte
146.
by ditojim 15y ago
why not publish group pricing on your website?
147.
by ditojim 15y ago
we are a 20 user organization. at $180/y/person, that's $3,600/year to have boomerang for my organization. google apps costs us $1,000/yr at $50/y/person..
148.
by ditojim 15y ago
ef that. take care of your customers or before you know it, you won't have any.
149.
by ditojim 15y ago
boomerang is going to start charging a pretty hefty subscription fee ($5/um personal and $15/u/m business). this script is well timed.
150.
by ditojim 15y ago
this sound like an opportunity for an insurance company to me. i'm sure they can come up with a rate..

More ›