disgrunt

19 ms·

151.
by disgrunt 6y ago
There are still lawsuits ongoing in the courts. You keep saying 60 of them, it's 54. You're so quick to question someone else's accounting skills earlier... There are ten lawsuits ongoing, not zero, ten. That process hasn&#x2
152.
by disgrunt 6y ago
And yet the mainstream media has cast him as the voice of reason in all of this mess. Hmm.
153.
by disgrunt 6y ago
The first thing that happens is the ballot is separated from the envelope. This is to protect the secrecy of the voter's choice. What is supposed to happen is that the signature on the envelope is matched with one on file (usually with
154.
by disgrunt 6y ago
A judge providing an opinion is not adjudication. And "presenting in court" is not the same as "the judge read the complaint and here's what they think about it before dismissing it for non-meritorious reasons".
155.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Nothing establishes trust like accusing those of making such claims, legitimate or not, of sedition.
156.
by disgrunt 6y ago
> Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and if the evidence presented makes demonstrably false claims, then we're done with that evidence, and should frown upon the person who presented it. In a court of law, all claims
157.
by disgrunt 6y ago
A poll book is typically used at a polling location. However, with absentee ballots, it works a little differently. In previous elections, to get an absentee ballot, you needed to request one, which had the equivalent effect to a poll book
158.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Good job. You cherry picked three lawsuits. Here's all 54. [0] Oh, and by the way, if a judge dismisses a case on procedural, jurisdictional or standing and then goes on to provide an opinion of the claims/evidence presented in a
159.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Maybe there isn't actually a procedure for this situation? If the highest court in the land says even if the claims turn out to be true there is still no remedy to be had. In other words, even if the election was provably stolen, they
160.
by disgrunt 6y ago
And if not the courts, maybe Congress needs an Election Commission to investigate election irregularity claims?
161.
by disgrunt 6y ago
The shoe was on the other foot in 2016. Many on the left claimed election fraud, including the Green Party filing lawsuits demanding recounts. Their disputes were with the same states in dispute in 2020 (Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin
162.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Then they should conduct their own forensic analysis of this image of a Dominion voting machine in Michigan. Until then, their dispute is opinion. A lot of these "fact checks" blur into the realm of opinion, not facts. If you can
163.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Ah, yes, reject evidence using an ad hominem. I'm sure you'll convince others with that tact. Dominion has yet to dispute any of the findings in this report, despite the Michigan judiciary giving them an opportunity to do so befor
164.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Ok, let's start with this forensic analysis of an actual Dominion voting machine that was used in the 2020 presidential election in Michigan. [0] [0]: https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-cou...
165.
by disgrunt 6y ago
I was answering the other posters question as to why the recount on it's own didn't just resolve the dispute. However, there was a forensic analysis done of a Dominion voting machine in Michigan with some disturbing findings. You
166.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Your frothing at the mouth hyperbole aside... I'm not a Republican, I'm not even an American, and I see a lot of issues with how this election was conducted. Maybe you don't, or don't want to. Maybe the end justifies the
167.
by disgrunt 6y ago
The Dominion claim isn't the only one in Georgia. In fact, most of the lawsuits, two of which are ongoing, are regarding the changes the Georgia Secretary of State made in March 2020 to relax signature matching and ballot curing rules
168.
by disgrunt 6y ago
And what about these five police officers killed in Dallas during a BLM protest? [0] [0]: https://fox11online.com/on-fox-11/gallery/pofficers-shot-at-...
169.
by disgrunt 6y ago
> You can dispute whatever you want, but by every legal process, your "dispute" has been settled. When does it end? The Constitution sets no statute of limitation under the First Amendment to petition the government for a redre
170.
by disgrunt 6y ago
> Maybe we should consider addressing real issues before they become violent protests. > The protest in the capitol yesterday was based on a fantasy: Trump's refusal to accept his loss, and continued reinforcement of election con
171.
by disgrunt 6y ago
> I also don't recall BLM protesters threatening the leaders of our government in a real and material way. Rand Paul says hi. [0] [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnL21qtGYcw
172.
by disgrunt 6y ago
1. U.S. elections aren't decided by popular vote. 2. Biden won narrowly in swing states. 3. The dispute is whether or not the votes cast were legitimate.
173.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Does that imply that you had doubt when a dozen or so cities were on fire as a result of protesters over the summer? If so, why?
174.
by disgrunt 6y ago
This is incorrect for multiple reasons: 1. There are laws in every U.S. state regarding what grounds the police have to detain someone. In most states, it boils down to reasonable articulable suspicion that someone has committed, is about t
175.
by disgrunt 6y ago
And the Antifa protesters that burned down police precincts and small businesses are "freedom fighters"?
176.
by disgrunt 6y ago
> The removal of calls for post-curfew peaceful protests in DC seems like a move that will galvanize the right against FB, given that they didn’t do this six months ago when Democrats were protesting. They weren’t rushing the Capitol bac
177.
by disgrunt 6y ago
> The spread of propaganda to undermine the democratic process is chilling. It's unpopular to say this, but both sides see it this way.
178.
by disgrunt 6y ago
Wasn't it an Atari Portfolio? If memory serves, it had a mostly functional MS-DOS, so writing a program for it was likely not an arduous task. That being said, rewatching those scenes, it was a striking little device for its day and ah
179.
by disgrunt 6y ago
It's sad that political correctness is mistaken for enlightenment.
180.
While Congress Squabbles over $2k, They Packed the Stimulus Bill with Pork(thehill.com)
16 points by disgrunt 6y ago|3 comments

More ›