diogenes4

21 ms·

91.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Hell, plants show plenty of signs of life. What isn't clear is what this means when applied to a chatbot.
92.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Can't use any of them on a plane.
93.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Same reason as always—it's useful for rapid prototyping. It's not like the frontend was ever rails's strong suit.
94.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I have difficulty interpreting your comment in any other way than as a commentary on free will. What is the meaning of intelligence otherwise?
95.
by diogenes4 3y ago
skeleton of theseus etc
96.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I believe that "sometime between 26,500 and 19,000 years ago" is an appositive marking the beginning of the land bridge's accessibility, not the time of migration. What they should have said is that the broadly accepted con
97.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I just took "intelligence" as a metonym for "thought processes". Again, I am unsure what it means to use intelligence if not through our own perception of our own intelligence, nor what utility such a concept would have.
98.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I imagine they'd be a lot more responsive to prison time, personally. A fine doesn't seem to capture the correct incentives here.
99.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I'm not sure what YIMBYism is beyond giving cash away to developers, tbh, nor what it has to do with laws being enforced. They seem like orthogonal concepts at first blush.
100.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I'm very curious how you model human knowledge such that it's dependent on free will.
101.
by diogenes4 3y ago
How are you defining intelligence as distinct from sentience? At first blush such a distinction has no utility.
102.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Why is this added to exported documents tho? It should only add the redirect in the browser.
103.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I have no clue what you're talking about, but there's fundamentally no evidence our thoughts are the decisive events leading to behavior rather than, say, a rationalization of said behavior. You're too bold in your modeling o
104.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> No, humans live in a world and use their intelligence to manipulate the world. An extremely bold claim! good luck demonstrating it.
105.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> Yet if a weakness is common, it also means that human coders frequently make the same mistake as well. It only means programmers commonly talk about it. This isn't the same thing as measuring incidence in production or distributio
106.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Gives them an edge on harassing their own employees maybe
107.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> I want to be able to take strings of untrusted code provided by users and execute them in a safe sandbox. Isn't this the entire pitch of the browser as an app platform rather than a document viewer? Why target it if it's not
108.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Yes, i agree that abuse is bad regardless of the perpetrator. No argument here.
109.
by diogenes4 3y ago
It is, but it doesn't have to be. We certainly don't have another term for regulating the general abuse of the public by a private entity other than "anti-trust".
110.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Ok so to state the obvious and it's insane to compare us to el salvador and seriously suggest we should become even more of a prison state than we already are. Secondly, part of the reason we have such a high crime rate is our high im
111.
by diogenes4 3y ago
It seems weird to target tiktok (or china for that matter) when everyone hoovers up and sells your data as a matter of fact. Everyone. And they all have bad intentions. What's so specially trustworthy about american fuckery over chines
112.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> The trouble is, how do you effectively oversee an agency that specializes in lies, misdirection, cover-ups, coercion, and blackmail? You destroy them—it's the only way to guarantee accountability.
113.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> Copyright still applies if you’re copying elements of the story My point is that the meaning of "copying" as described here is unclear unclear if it's not restricted to verbatim plagiarism. As is "elements", fo
114.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> Can you predict crimes? Of course you can, the math is clear. I don't follow—just because arrests were made doesn't imply crime happened, and it doesn't imply the police are arresting the people committing the actual cri
115.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Absolutely, the state prerogative is to presume excellence. That doesn't mean we need to take this attitude at face value as rational humans.
116.
by diogenes4 3y ago
Surely this opens a door where, because an agent is unlikely to reproduce work verbatim but rather in a more compressed or decompressed wording, humans are held to a different standard? Otherwise humans would remain an effective way to la
117.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> Most Western societies are also highly concerned with stability as well as personal freedom. All states are at least seemingly concerned with balancing the collective and individual freedoms. Western ones just have the arrogance to cla
118.
by diogenes4 3y ago
> Very legitimate. Very legitimate at what ? It's the characterization of the values nerve I don't believe our media providers have the means to evaluate. The parallel with serotonin is that the coverage has led many people th
119.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I really wish we could convince the anti-trust efforts to focus on search quality over competition—it's a lot more relevant to google's actual harm than comparison to competitors, especially when the competitors are guilty of much
120.
by diogenes4 3y ago
I'll admit, this is a great example of a workplace i'd rather be tortured than work at myself.

More ›