digitcatphd

7 ms·

31.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
I had a team of developers and essentially told them all 'either learn to code with Claude' or you're out. What I found is the more junior developers started 'vibe coding' resulting in a net decrease in performance,
32.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
Yes, precisely these tools and yes, I did cross-reference with studies. In-fact the physician immediately misattributed the cause, and I had to guide her into self-correcting herself, since she failed to ask conditional followup questions t
33.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
The problem I have with this is that this style of agent design, providing enormous autonomy, makes sense in coding while keeping an expert human in the loop since it can self-correct via debugging. What would the other use cases of giving
34.
Ask HN: Should primary care doctors be replaced with AI?
3 points by digitcatphd 1y ago|4 comments
35.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
After a run up to ATH
36.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
“ Josh Mitteldorf studies evolutionary theory of aging using computer simulations.” > This is exactly why one must read the author before going into their content. What does this even mean?
37.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
Also likely a political PR stunt.
38.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
This is clearly a PR stunt. Perplexity knows Google would not sell Chrome, it is the holy grail of their ads strategy and would cripple their moat.
39.
Ask HN: Has anyone exited a business with a CoFounder from YC Founder match?
2 points by digitcatphd 1y ago|0 comments
40.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
Respectfully, starting one's argument with a factually invalid statement is not a good way to argue against a bubble. If by 'every' you are referring to the foundation model providers, this is not 100% of the 'AI service
41.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
I have started to notice this as well over the past several months, in-fact, I would say it is orders of magnitude larger than the Crypto bubble and when it bursts will be significantly more impactful. Right now, everything is propped up on
42.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
I ran some tests on a similar concept using LangGraph. Unfortunately, I think while the results are meaningfully different from a foundation model, they don't supplement actual real-world data yet and don't provide sufficient dive
43.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
Agreed. I think most of the arguments are premised on AI getting infinitely better for some reason, without anyone outlining clear arguments addressing the inherent architectural limitations of today's LLMs. I have been in this space s
44.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
I’m sure most of the problems cited in this article will be easily solved within the next five years or so, waiting for perfection and doing nothing won’t pay dividends
45.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
If I’m not mistaken they are using high valuations of top companies to conclude AI is overhyped? Sorry, but weren’t these valuations escalated because of low interest rates and quantitative easing? Perhaps combined with increased concentrat
46.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.02153
47.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
this is smart, but I think NVIDIA's paper on fine tuning small language models presents a sightly more efficient approach
48.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
I built a GitHub repo that allows you to quickly spin up LangGraph agents using Claude Code with built-in tools and pre tested configurations. https://www.braid.ink
49.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
Makes sense, yes, I think a spectrum of tools will be useful depending on the build. N8N, LangGraph, and working with primitives all have their use case and then tools built on each will be useful much like the landscape of RAG builds have
50.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
All these arguments remind me of early LLMs. In fact, most of the arguments are nearly identical. Heck, even Bitcoin back 10 years ago was demonized and now governments are pushing for national reserves. If you have used GPT o3, you have us
51.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
Thanks!!!
52.
Show HN: Build production-ready LangGraph AI agents with natural language(github.com)
2 points by digitcatphd 1y ago|0 comments
53.
by digitcatphd 1y ago
As of now yes. But we are still in day 0.1 of GenAI. Do you think this will be the case when o3 models are 10x better and 100x cheaper? There will be a turning point but it’s not happened yet.
54.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
The reality is I suspect one will use different models for different things. Think of it like having different modes of transportation. You might use your scooter, bike, car, jet - depending on the circumstances. A bike was invented 100 yea
55.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
Exactly. Everything is massive kindle for a wildfire and it comes to show how tiny of a spark it takes. Yet - people keep adding more kindle.
56.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
This doesn't have anything to do with DS, despite what the media claims, it comes to a heightened sense of fear people have with playing with fire.
57.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
Nah, this just means training isn’t the advantage. There’s plenty to be had by focusing on inference. It’s like saying apple is dead because back in 1987 there was a cheaper and faster PC offshore. I sure hope so otherwise this is a pretty
58.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
Don't make me tap the sign.
59.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
Economic cycles. As soon as the next cycle builds up momentum all the low risk entrepreneurs will rush in again.
60.
by digitcatphd 2y ago
All of the arguments presented in this were equally true in 2013 as they are in 2025 and there are many more dimensions than you are taking into consideration. For instance, the demographics of HN users could have changed, or the economic c

More ›