3 ms·
Nah, this just means training isn’t the advantage. There’s plenty to be had by focusing on inference. It’s like saying apple is dead because back in 1987 there
by digitcatphd 2y ago
Nah, this just means training isn’t the advantage. There’s plenty to be had by focusing on inference. It’s like saying apple is dead because back in 1987 there was a cheaper and faster PC offshore. I sure hope so otherwise this is a pretty big moment to question life goals.
- sdesol 2y ago> saying apple is dead because back in 1987 there was a cheaper and faster PC offshore What Apple did was build a luxury brand and I don't see that happening with LLMs. When it comes to luxury, you really can't compete with price.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- have_faith 2y agoApple isn’t a luxury brand in the normal sense, it’s odd that people think this because they’re more expensive. They’re not the technical equivalent of Prada or Rolex etc. Apple’s ecosystem cohesion and still unmatched UX (still flawed) is a real value-add that normal luxury brands don’t have.
- mikaraento 2y agoSo maybe not luxury, but premium. Like MB or Audi in cars. Pricing still plays out differently.